that is not an adjective I EVER expected to hear in connection with her majesty!
2007-11-04 07:27:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by min 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
What a relief, for a minute there I thought I was back in polls/surveys. Iam also curious as to who cast those votes, wasn't over here (I don't think). I disagree with the glamorous part, she Never changes styles, especially those hats. I'll bet she has a million of those hats tucked away, same style, just different colors with different colored feathers, ribbons, bows, flowers . However she always comes across as very digified.
2007-11-04 08:12:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by snow ball 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I came to the conclusion some time ago that Norman Hartnel was her dress designer because he made the the sort of strange clothes she like to wear. I thought after that someone would have the courage to give her some real advice but when I saw her meeting the the king of saudi arabia I realised she was a hopeless case.
2007-11-04 09:58:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Maid Angela 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think this is a stunt. Unless the notion that money and celebrity are the same thing as glamour has gone further than I thought. The woman has plenty of both.
Strong whiff of Buck House spin, dontchya fink ?
2007-11-04 20:04:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't call her glamorous. She's very elegant in what
she wears and always looks appropriate and well dressed.
Princess Diana was glamorous.
2007-11-04 10:33:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Queen of what? We voted Gladys our Queen on our Senior section for having "seniority". She pulls rank on us younger ones. So, who is the Queen you are talking about?
2007-11-04 08:26:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Harley Lady 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not the Queen of England, surely???? Who the heck voted for her?
2007-11-04 18:24:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by CJ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not a word I would have associated with the Queen.
2007-11-04 09:01:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Aloha_Ann 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I've heard your Queen Mum described many ways, but that was never one of them. If she's considered glamerous, then the rest of us are just drop-dead gorgeous!!
2007-11-04 09:05:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by night-owl gracie 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have been registered partially sighted for years, and last Tuesday I got Glasses to let me see a wee bit better, so I will have a look.
2007-11-04 08:39:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
She is no way glamorous in my book & never will be. She became ugly when she treated Lady Diana so badly. She should have been watching her son, Prince Charles a bit closer. Don't you think?
2007-11-04 07:26:09
·
answer #11
·
answered by Shortstuff13 7
·
3⤊
3⤋