English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Globalization

2007-11-04 07:05:37 · 6 answers · asked by vincentalexander2003 1 in Social Science Economics

6 answers

Because of globalization, tariffs no longer represent long-term solutions and neither does any form of protectionism because these tariffs reduce the levels of competition and therefore reduce the quality on the long run. Lower quality means less demand and lower revenues which means lower wages. Work unions play a major role in protecting jobs, but in a free economy employees are going to be let go of when necessary.For example Chinese products provide Americans with low-price products leaving Americans more income to be spent on other products or even increases savings. The point I am trying to make is that protectionism will no longer serve any economy, but that it is going to happen of course at the expense of the underdeveloped economies that can't always compete because of their circumstances.

2007-11-04 07:41:18 · answer #1 · answered by Leen 2 · 0 0

2

2016-07-23 00:21:08 · answer #2 · answered by Carol 3 · 0 0

Tariffs will protect some industries and jobs but they will hurt others. Increasing trade creates winners and losers in the economy, but tariffs do also, and the net effect of tariffs for the whole economy is a loss. Small rich countries that must trade a lot have extensive safety nets and income redistribution (national health care, education and training, and generous unemployment benefits) to protect the workers that suffer losses from trade and the exposure to world markets. This is a more economically efficient solution to the problem than tariffs.

2007-11-04 07:28:20 · answer #3 · answered by meg 7 · 0 0

Tariffs can protect wages by insulating domestic firms from foreign competitors. However, they often result in rising prices. Tariffs can protect jobs in the sense that they may prevent a struggling firm from having to lay off workers, but outsourcing isn't really a tariff issue.

2007-11-04 08:59:39 · answer #4 · answered by soupisgoodfood 4 · 0 0

purely in the fast term. The long-term harm using commerce imbalances is worse. regardless of the undeniable fact that the superb thank you to maintain jobs in united statesa. is to allow agencies to do what they're created to do--make money--that's considered necessary close company tax loopholes and supply up paying company executives insane salaries. A $a million million pay shrink for somebody already making $10 million per year (no longer which contain bonuses and perks) might shop 33 workers who earn $30,000 per year.

2016-12-30 18:35:53 · answer #5 · answered by cassone 4 · 0 0

The Highest Paying Surveys : http://OnlineSurveys.uzaev.com/?AXCn

2016-07-14 04:13:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers