Complaints came down last week. Just bloggers, but complaints they have 15 days to answer to. I have dozens of links from Hsu to the federal lobbyist $ (moral issue not illegal) also the same taking 10 mil from the State of New York running for re-election placing it into the Presidential war chest. Edwards said on ABC This Week today ... beyond immoral I believe the system is corrupt...
Can an independent council rule on such matters or shall history prevail and yet another Judge hands out a free pass?
For you Bush mongers, you have every right to pursue your thought of illegal war. But obviously, legally, there are NO legs to the argument. With Clinton she did not keep proper records regarding the Chinese $ and that alone is a violation. She never returned all the HSU funds... the first complaintant wants the $$ ?? Any ideas?
2007-11-04 06:23:26 · 14 answers · asked by Mele Kai 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
http://prorev.com/wwindex.htm
2007-11-04 07:20:03 · update #1
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-donors19oct.9,0,4231217.story?coll=la-home-center
excuse me I do these by hand and can not check this edit ..s/b Unlikely treasure trove of donors for Clinton
2007-11-04 07:23:45 · update #2
darn sorry the link is off Google the article & LATimes
http://www.fec.gov/info/PartyGuide/Chapter10.htm
rules
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1007/6643.html
last week filings ... not big but a start
2007-11-04 07:28:42 · update #3
They have a chance to do so, the question is, will they? I seriously doubt it because the Clinton's have got some kind of good-luck charm that's kept them safe from prosecution for all of their criminal activities and their obvious money-grubbing ways.
2007-11-04 06:28:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
properly, in my view, that's no longer completely real. maximum newspaper chains in the U.S. are Republican owned and controlled. The media ignores issues like this via fact someplace down the line they parent they gets greater out of the tale later. They do this to each physique, no longer in trouble-free terms Democrats. initially the media and newspapers have been called the Fourth sources and the watchdog of government, meaning that as quickly as the government; which replaced into absolutely everyone in politics from the President on down; tried any shady dealings the media would debunk it and that replaced into all she wrote. in the present day with the creation of the media being owned, controlled and operated by way of people who make a contribution heavily to politicians campaigns, there is not any watchdog of government. If the government needs something coated up, they only tell the media they administration to conceal it up or invent a narrative approximately something which will take the publics minds off their backs. whilst George Sr. replaced into President the low fee expenditures and loan fiasco occurred. Does absolutely everyone yet me keep in mind the headlines the 1st day after being found out who brought about this fiasco? The ringleader replaced into none different than George W. Bush, our present day President. the 2nd day and on a daily basis thereafter there replaced into no point out of Georgie boy. in my view, human beings tend to forget what the government needs them to forget except it reward them to no longer forget.
2016-11-10 06:21:32 · answer #2 · answered by larrinaga 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
Hillary and the never tell a lie adultrator who never inhaled, have watergates whitehouse gates and all kinds of gates -while their helpers are still in prison for the crimes commited with the Clintons-what is new
you put in a jolt againstAmerica and our President and for the terrorists.
Satire=and thanks for standing up for the terrorist take over of Iraq, so they can fund a different way to destroy America with the oil money there. Keep fighting to get the free contries out of fighting the terrorists the Ben Laden also now sends there to fight, instead of again to the usa till they get control of that oil money.
there are a few in the Democratic party that think of God as more than a 3 letter word too. Jesus amazing grace=God
2007-11-04 06:33:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
So far there's been nothing allegedabout Hillary's campaign. but the usual minor infractions every campaign has.
The neocons are simply trying to blow things out of proportion to smear her--their typical tactics. Notice they ARAEN'T addressing the issues? That's because they have no ideas to offer and so must resort to slander and mudslinging.
But that won't fly where the FEC isconcerned.
2007-11-04 06:29:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Every campaign gets accused of fundraising violations. Didn't George B get the same thing? People have such short memories - what a bunch of garbage.
2007-11-04 06:27:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary will walk. IF it becomes too much of an issue she will once again say that the "boys" are picking on her because she is a girl. Just like in the debate.
2007-11-04 06:27:32 · answer #6 · answered by afreshpath_admin 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If she or anyone violated campaign laws, they should be prosecuted, period. I doubt she will be. If enough of a stink is raised, then she will make a show of giving the money back.
2007-11-04 06:26:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She may have to fork over some money, but she will never have any kind of a record or anything. Never gonna happen.
2007-11-04 06:27:56 · answer #8 · answered by ganna 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wish I knew what you were talking about because I would like to understand the situation. However, I'm completely in the dark. What did she do?
2007-11-04 06:28:34 · answer #9 · answered by Jan F 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How about we prosecute the current administration for negligence! or better sheer stupidity!
2007-11-04 06:27:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋