English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

OUT OF BUSINESS?
Pan AM and Lockerbie... Swissair 111?? who knows TWA is tanking? Egypt Air?

If you look back at those we know of and those we wonder? Each time a major airliner bit the dust or nearly. Then the effect to Boeing, Lockhead and all the companies that our military depend on for our forces?? Think about it?

9/11 they knew to target United and Eastern. Why them, again? Why not Continental?

No government conspiracy I just want to know do you think that these plans are deliberate down to the wire? Not random. And add do you feel given current events commercial cruise liners are at risk. As a fully loaded ship now carries up to 4,000 people and can ram into a source to create? Thought s hereanybody?

2007-11-04 06:07:31 · 3 answers · asked by Mele Kai 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

3 answers

That's a great question and I cannot explain it here, but I suggest you find the book How Satan turned America against God, by William Grady. It's over 970 pages and 1,500 end notes and well researched and will explain a ton of stuff.

I was impressed and the guy is super thorough. Also has a bunch of stuff in it about your buddies Bill and Hilliary, naw just kidding, not about the info, but the buddy stuff. Take care

2007-11-04 11:22:10 · answer #1 · answered by R J 7 · 0 0

There isn't a connection. Pan Am was on it's way out for years. TWA tanked because of labor costs and unprofitable routes. SwissAir is still going strong, as is Egypt Air.

Boeing is going gangbusters - currently they are turning orders away and will be doing so for the next several years. Lockheed-Martin is still doing it's thing.

An aside, but something interesting, is that Egypt Air crash. There's a lot of reason to speculate that that was a dry-run by Al Qaeda. The Atlantic Monthly did a fascinating cover story about it a few years ago... might have been prior to 9/11, even, though I don't recall for sure.

2007-11-04 06:19:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

The unusual element is the Federal courtroom device has a greater advantageous fulfillment value in convicting terrorist vs. a armed forces tribunal. The query is now, how will the courts device manage evidence that could have come from what some call 'superior interrogation' or some call 'torture'.

2016-10-03 08:12:18 · answer #3 · answered by hyler 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers