English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

I read an opinion before answering that seemed to make some sense, and she may well be right. I take the opposite view however, because I think a single man has more freedom to appease the corporate machine than a family man who has other ancillary obligations. (Particularly those people who have jobs that require them to "schmooze" clients after hours such as ad execs and sales persons,etc.)

2007-11-04 05:45:13 · answer #1 · answered by Captain S 7 · 0 0

its depends but yes some married men do with children because of all these benefits helping out families on low income

but that doesnt mean to say that all men have benfits some men also have 2 to 3 jobs and work very hard

2007-11-04 13:05:11 · answer #2 · answered by Perfectionist 6 · 0 0

The only thing I know about that is one time I went to the gas station and filled my car up with gas. As I was paying at the register, some guy standing in line sneered and rudely told me now I can go home and tell my husband how much of his money I spent. I told him I don't have a husband and that's why I have money. The cashier and everyone else in line busted up laughing and he stood there beet red in the face.

2007-11-04 13:43:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Some general appearances seem to show "yes" in some cases, but not on average. This depends on the career field. The only thing I have seen about this is it is the appearance of stability that can provide this perception to some employers.

2007-11-04 13:30:38 · answer #4 · answered by mmarks315 1 · 0 0

they do not
studies have shown single men of the same education earn more
this is because they can work overtime and longer hours and are promoted faster than someone encumbered with family responsibilities

2007-11-04 13:05:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers