How is it that "Middle Line Backer" and "Axe Murder" require the same basic skills set?

Answer 1

How true...it's about the kill, in either case. One needs to acquire a lot of skills, and train hard, to be either an axe murderer or a middle line backer. I'm certain that the answerer who mentioned OJ is right...his training for sports, and in running away from the scene, helped him so much in committing (and getting away with) a double murder.

Answer 2

How is it that anyone could think that a sportsman had the same basic skills as a murderer? A basic requirement, as your question should make clear, is that sports people do not kill - except for OJ

Both breath and move have a good arm swing. This is precisely why companies have problems recruiting staff - they advertise for axe murderers when they really want a line backer.

You need to think about what you are defining and then you will discover that one of the basic requirements of a line backer is that they do not want to wield an axe.

If your definition of a requirement permits the inclusion of a murderer, then it is obvious that the definition is not accurate enough. Rather, it should specifically excluded murderers and include speed, agility and desire to win without mutilation to the opponents.

Have a look at a few decent job specs on line, or read something on Six Sigma.

Answer 3

innovations-blowing question. Leah is in part innovations-blowing and on the innovations-blowing music however the bigger subject arises whilst in trouble-free terms one parent is a service. In that concern a field try will in no way paintings and the breeder has purely accomplished greater to harm their breed by way of passing on a mutation 50% of the time without probability of detecting it. it is truly real of accepted sires who're used very normally and/ or by way of use of synthetic insemination the place their genes are disseminated in an somewhat intense frequency between something of the inhabitants. "field" sorting out is likewise each so often observed as "try" matings. it is an somewhat unfavourable and unacceptable technique for figuring out inherited subject concerns even previously there have been any DNA tests available. Breeders will in no way do away with inherited ailments with try matings for the easy reason that there are maximum of mutations and... you may no longer continuously perceive people who're companies. additionally, if a service to service try mating occurs then the danger of producing an affected animal is 25% so the prospect nevertheless exists that an affected isn't made from each mating, to no longer point out by way of that element it is too previous due... so why blindly mate without understanding no count if a mutation exists with the opportunity of propagating greater of an identical problem? this would properly be a silly innovations-set enormously now whilst there are maximum of DNA tests and well being displays available. the problem isn't in trouble-free terms with the priority "what if the two mothers and dads are companies of a recessive illness" yet greater so "what if in trouble-free terms one parent is a service." that's whilst the problem keeps to pass undetected.

Answer 4

I don't know, pal. I am just here for the 2 points on this question. LOL

Answer 5

Because they went to different schools, together...