They are already blaming her, because she voted for the war. In fact every criticism of GW is a criticism of Hillary.
2007-11-04 02:49:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jackie Oh! 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
As i glance at a lot of those solutions, the only element that stands proud is the immaturity this is working rampant interior of our united states. It starts out interior the teenage years and it keeps to plaque one for existence. do no longer choose Hillary from the previous simply by fact she merely may be the Savior that our united states is calling for. I now complete nicely that Jesus grew to become into given a complicated time till now human beings wised up and found out that he grew to become into the son of God and could save us. as simply by Judas, Jesus grew to become into in a position to die for our sins. i think what i'm asserting is that i'm evaluating a lot of those persons asserting undesirable issues approximately Hillary to Judas. do no longer you all understand that the greater you attempt to tear Hillary aside the greater suitable she will become. Michael Moore's video clips make much greater funds whilst human beings criticized them and grew to become it into an argument. Then it merely makes human beings prefer to make certain the movie much greater. So, bypass forward human beings. Say each and every of the nastiest issues you are able to think of of roughly Hillary, it won't in common terms make Hillary even greater suitable yet interior the long end you human beings could understand how silly that's to choose her. simply by fact the bible says, "do no longer choose yest ye be judged" if it is so we've different peolpe claiming to be religious yet don't understand that the Bible isn't a %. and chosen at random what we'd prefer to have self assurance. You the two have self assurance the bible thoroughly or you greater advantageous exchange into an atheist in accordance to Revelations(this is my opinion on what i think of the very final verse of the bible says)
2016-10-03 07:56:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by goldthorpe 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We won't have to wait until the election. It's already happening...as one poster pointed out, "Bill had more chances than Bush."
It's truly funny how the retardicans try to blame everything that goes wrong on someone else.
2007-11-04 03:01:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
As soon as she is sworn in, they will start blaming her for the deaths of soldiers in Iraq, and for Osama bin Laden still being alive.
The Republicans tried to blame President Clinton for 9/11, even though he had been out of office for 7 months.
2007-11-04 02:57:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
We both know they will blame her as soon as she's in office, the same day ,and will continue to blame her if she doesn't catch him that is till eight years after her presidency.
Right wing reality. Clinton is responsible for OBL while it was the Republican congress who sabotaged Bill Clinton in every effort he made to fight terrorism
http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=145
Bill Clinton is responsible for 9/11. Bush is responsible for no new al quaida attack on American soil. Liberals are responsible for the defeat in Iraq and Afghanistan. Hillary will be responsible from day one for everything that happens till 2024 at least
2007-11-04 02:54:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
None, because its her husbands fault, get it straight kid.
The Bush admin has not had as many CLEARCUT chances that the Slick Willy Clinton admi had.
And no Republicans will not blame her for anything Bush has done, they will blame her for screwing up and turning the clock back to a Bill slick willy nightmare though
Steven C, wow 7 whole MONTHS clinton had been out of office ! that is really a longggggggg time, so in your opinion Bush should have tidied up the whole clinton mess and caught OBL in 7 months
2007-11-04 02:55:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
It's in direct proportion to how long she complains about what she's inherited.
Bush had 234 days from inauguration until 9/11. She'll have that long before we can declare her a dud.
2007-11-04 02:55:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
She would be sworn in at noon so by the time of the inaugural balls she'll be hammered for not finding Osama.
2007-11-04 02:51:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I thought they already were blaming her and any one else who does not toe the party line
2007-11-04 03:43:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think they will be content blaming Bill
2007-11-04 02:52:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by You are all, weirdos. 3
·
3⤊
0⤋