English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In the 20th century, they discovered:

a right to be paid for not working
a right to medical care for the elderly
a right to medical care for the poor
a right to paid retirement

it's looking like they might soon discover a right to health care for all. what other perversions of our founders' intent will libs discover in this century?

2007-11-04 02:17:47 · 21 answers · asked by WJ 7 in Politics & Government Politics

21 answers

I'll go with a right to college educations, Alex, for $200.

And yes, social welfare, social security, medicare and medicaid were are inventions in the 20th century.

2007-11-04 02:23:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

Your SARCASM is SHOWING!
No one should have a right to be paid for not Working, but we are paying Farmers not to plant crops.
We have medicare for the elderly.
The poor are not deprived of medical care. I know several People who do not have medical insurance, but have had surgery in Hospitals with no charges to them!
All Legal Working People in the USA have some form of paid retirement. Some professions offer retirement payments as a benefit.
Some provide for IRA accounts, and match the amount the Person contributes usually up to 3%.
And, do not forget the Social Security Retirement. But, of course it has troubles because: Our Politicians have been stealing the money for about 45 years to pay for their Social Experiments. Plus, there are People collecting who never worked, and did not contribute anything to the SS. They still get paid by SS because they can not work due to self inflicted disabilities, such as drug dependency or alcholism.

2007-11-04 02:36:58 · answer #2 · answered by Sentinel 5 · 2 1

I think they will discover the "right to take paid sabbatical from work" Pretty soon we will be paying people to do "soul searching" on the govt dime.

I can see the "right to give all illegals an education" and then give them further affirmative action assistance beyond what we have now.

Obviously healthcare they will try to nab out of the air........and I would suspect that they will try and tax the internet and such.

Pretty much any legislation that does not benefit upper middle class to rich white americans............yeah they are the racist's not us.

2007-11-04 02:37:18 · answer #3 · answered by Ancient Warrior DogueDe Bordeaux 5 · 3 0

the 2nd exchange is merely as legitimate as we talk because it became into while it became into written. it is not almost maintaining the authorities honest. inspect the looting and riots in New Orleans throughout Katrina. are no longer community gangs a hazard to regulation and order and democracy? Tyranny is offered in lots of varieties. Civilian possession of fireams is the superb verify opposed to tyranny while all else has failed, regardless of if it comes from a distant places potential, corrupt community officers or the crack homestead down the line. alongside with freedom comes the accountability to guard it. regrettably, too many individuals in recent times refuse to step as much as that accountability. Oh, and for those usa-bashers that say we are the only ones who choose for weapons.... The Swiss additionally understand the accountability of each and every citizen for the protection of the rustic. they're required to maintain attack rifles of their residences. in case you pick for to be a CITIZEN of the rustic include your rights and ordinary jobs. in case you prefer to be a difficulty, there are a number of different places in the international that think of such as you. bypass stay there. we are able to all be happier.

2017-01-04 21:25:45 · answer #4 · answered by stranger 3 · 0 0

Very few Americans are opposed to medical care for the elderly and the poor. Only a extreme neocon would be opposed.

Healthcare is a serious issue in this nation due to the high cost of it. The USA is the only place on Earth where someone has to pay 10 bucks for a asprin in the hospital.

As for "paid retirement", that is called Social Security in which we are entitled too....because we pay for it. It is a right under the law.

2007-11-04 02:22:10 · answer #5 · answered by Villain 6 · 5 3

The RIGHT to be safe,all risky activities will be banned,even driving a car.

The RIGHT to be happy,don't like your face,your sex,where you live,The Government will fix that for you.

The RIGHT to be a sexual pervert ( it makes you happy ),government will provide outlets for your perversion.

All at taxpayer expense.

Yes,you do have a RIGHT to make your contribution to the RIGHTS of others,just another 15-20 % of your income.

2007-11-04 02:49:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I disagree with you. There are elderly and poor people who need help. Personally, I don't mind having my taxes spend for the NEEDY. I don't want to pay for those who don't WANT to work, anymore than you.
Taking care of needy people isn't a perversion. I hope you never find yourself needing help and having to depend on people like yourself.

2007-11-04 02:34:58 · answer #7 · answered by katydid 7 · 4 1

Another person who claims they know what the founders wanted. Wow, I thought people like you had grown up, matured, and realized YOU CAN'T SPEAK FOR THEM. When you try you just sound biased.

2007-11-04 03:38:11 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 0 1

Those are some of the reasons Democrats will control both Congress and the White House after the 2008 elections.

2007-11-04 02:35:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Right, we would hate to have these fake rights interfering with the real ones - like the right to have a permanent indentured servant class for the rich to exploit, or the right to live off daddy's trust fund or estate and never contribute anything to society, while never paying any taxes..

2007-11-04 02:42:37 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers