There seemed to be people in other thread (involving taking responsibility for something as simple as outing sexist bigots) ...that thought feminists shouldn't take ANY responsibility for distancing themselves from radicals.
So this begs the question:
If feminists aren't responsible to ensure radicals have no place in the mainstream, WHO IS responsible?
Anyone?
If the NAACP had many anti-white members that were very vocal about it & even wrote books about it, would the leaders of the NAACP have a responsibility to make sure they were outed as racists & sent packing?
Or would it be someone else's responsibility? Would the NAACP be able to say: "well, not everyone here is like" that & expect that to stick?
The responsibility falls somewhere. If not on the feminists, then on who?
2007-11-04 01:19:25 · 3 answers · asked by hopscotch 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Maybe you can help me out here. And I wish you would...
In this forum, we're (collectively, including myself) talking about having an open mind and accepting diversity...
And you want to SHUN people you don't agree with?
Seriously, please help me out because I honestly don't see the point.
2007-11-04 01:30:24 · answer #1 · answered by Michael K 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what your asking isn't possible, to shun someone means to ignore them and stay away from them, you can't take responsibility for someone you're shunning
"the feminists" is not the name of an organization, there is no official membership so they cannot officially deny anyone membership
2007-11-04 13:45:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The National Rifle Association could take care of them.
I'll just get my shotgun.....
It will send a messege to the rest that we won't tolerate intolerance anymore!
2007-11-04 10:01:54 · answer #3 · answered by Christian 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋