And in that Wikipedia article, you will note the immediate appearance of the word, "hypothetical." You will also notice the statement that no such thing has ever been observed. In fact, nothing has ever been observed for which a wormhole would be a plausible consideration. I believe physicists come up with stuff like this to sound erudite and put themselves on the academic map. Then, because they have a sci-fi type of mystique, the "theories" become popular. Yes, they flex their math muscles and create formulae which seem to allow for things like this, but I believe their math is just as bogus as their physics. The conclusions, at least, seem to be.
Let's not forget the famous Diderot story and how a simple equation was offered and "Donc, Dieu existe!" Yeah, shur: QED, my asstronomy.
2007-11-04 01:58:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brant 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Mathematically, convinced, realistically? That we do not really understand. the problem with wormholes in accordance to mathematical fashions derived from ideas of standard relativity a wormhole will be quite volatile and we would pick some variety of unfavourable capacity to "inject" into the wormhole to keep it open because if even something as small as a proton enters a wormhole, it would want to doubtlessly fall down through even the smallest perturbations of area time. unfavourable capacity is likewise hypothetical, in spite of the indisputable fact that it would want to carry a wormhole open lengthy adequate to bypass by one. yet another significant setback is the quantity of capacity required to even make one contained in the first position. in case you imagine about it, to link 2 distant factors in area to the point that they just about contact would take an huge volume of gravitational capacity. in actuality, i'm no longer even certain if a supermassive black hollow can grant adequate gravity to make a wormhole that hyperlinks 2 factors in area that are mild years aside.
2016-10-23 09:13:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by azucena 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is proof that they exist. I have read as per Dr. Ricardo Carezani's theory of Autodynamics that worms holes do exist but only in the Garden..
2007-11-04 01:48:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by goring 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
we don't know. theres so many unknowns. basically the one big unknown is if space can actually connect to another part of space. some would say space does connect to itself. others would say space is like a piece of paper (without glue or anything like that). you can fold a piece of paper as many times as you want but you'll never get it to suddenly get one corner to attach itself to another.
if it does connect to itself then we just need to figure out how to create the gravity of a black hole and then somehow bend the space that was warped onto another part of space.
sounds easy enough right?
2007-11-04 02:17:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
u have asked the same question in which i am massed up too!! I am trying to find the answer of this question but all in vain.
2007-11-04 01:50:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
these two websites give you a very good explanation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole
http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/schww.html
2007-11-04 01:46:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by abulshabab 3
·
0⤊
0⤋