Seem's to be quite a common practice according to the pro Mccann's
2007-11-04 01:31:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
3⤋
It makes me ponder whether all people who experience the 'choose' to 'safeguard newborn neglectors' might experience the comparable if it have been their newborn the Mc's and their cronies have been checking on, might they nonetheless safeguard them then? My little ones are maximum priceless in my existence and that i might in no way ever pass away them on my own except they have been with somebody who i ought to completely believe... Edit: that approximately somes the 'mom' of the century up little weed! nicely mentioned elsie, could no longer agree greater. Heidi, nicely mentioned. there are a number of greater of those 'stupid' human beings approximately and that isn't any longer confusing to be conscious who!
2016-12-08 11:37:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No of course not. If they do Social Services would put them on the risk register and eventually remove them from the family home if there was further risk.Most English Families are renowned for their compassion towards children.They take their kids out with them.Often spending time with them at weekends.Socially families find entertainment to amuse their kids ,sports,dancing,music lessons,swimming etc.Clubs and groups are popular as well.
2007-11-04 01:38:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lindsay Jane 6
·
7⤊
1⤋
I have found this Trait in most Countries,The British are no better or worse for neglecting their Children than anyone else. You have only to look at Television or Newspapers to find this out, people are selfish no matter what Country they come from.
2007-11-04 01:43:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by janus 6
·
7⤊
1⤋
Increasing too in my opinion. Parents simply see kids as a must have accessory that they cannot be bothered to look after properly. As a result the Chav is on the rise, spoilt kids run the streets and the parents don't offer any help as they simply throw money at the problem rather than root out the cause of this behaviour.
2007-11-04 01:38:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jay 4
·
5⤊
3⤋
You are obviously not British or you would not have made this inoffensive comment for which I will be reporting!!!Nothing has been proved so get your facts straight before making such comments.Where ever you come from you can you honestly say that anyone in your country leaves their child unattended.I am not condoning what the Mcanns did but trying to make a point.Next time you post a question think about the people you might be offending 1st
2007-11-04 01:42:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by PIRANHA 4
·
3⤊
6⤋
No, The British are renowned for neglegting their teeth. YUK!!!!!
For Claire.......
You forgot to mention that Americans can't funtion without toothpaste, unlike the Britts
2007-11-04 02:10:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Help4me 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
I have no idea where you are from. But 'Moron' comes to mind.
The way children are treated as slaves, bought, sold and abused in other parts of the world should concern you far more that how the English treat children.
Life expectancy and disease as well as abuse rates in the UK are far lower that many other places
2007-11-04 01:38:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
Nobody elected the McCanns to represent us and nobody elected you to espouse your opinion about the English.
2007-11-04 01:39:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by resignedtolife 6
·
7⤊
0⤋
No, baby sitters were always used in my family, seems to me that there are some who don't care. They were probably latchkey kids, so don't know any better.
2007-11-04 04:11:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋