English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean they're even promoting "horserace" candidates, (those who raise the most money) knowing they'll receive the money from the candidate (in commercial revenues) if they get them the nomination. It's an obvious conflict of interest. Then again, if a candidate says they'll enforce our Anti-Trust Laws, they'll be marginalized or ignored by all of the media (TV, Print) monopolies.

2007-11-03 21:57:49 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

1 answers

Not the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, there is competition among a handful of conglomerates.
The FCC needs to do it's job.
They currently plan to relax the ownership laws even further.

This is a Republican / Democrat issue:
Republicans favor deregulation.
Democrats believe there is public interest in preventing concentration of media ownership.
Time for the other party.

2007-11-04 03:12:10 · answer #1 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers