Her polarizing effect is all but insuring that the dems will be kept out of the our Oval Office for another 4 years.
2007-11-03 21:36:23 · 20 answers · asked by wider scope 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So far, so good.
Of course, she shouldn't. lol
2007-11-03 21:43:29 · update #1
i think youve made the whole point. obviously with tax and spend, failed welfare schemes and unilateral surrender, they have no concept at all as to whats good for them. if shes in , then rudy wins and, keeping them out of the oval office is certainly for the best.
2007-11-03 22:12:56 · answer #1 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
the two way, the Democrats are already in a win-win project. the two Obama and Hillary are the two very solid contenders. putting the very few very own adjustments aside, Obama and Hillary are scuffling with for virtually the comparable regulations, in common terms slightly differing of their physique of techniques to handling important subjects (different than their stand on coping with the Iraq war). i'm all rooting for Obama. yet whilst Obama loses the nomination, i'm going to be greater suitable than happy to furnish my vote for Hillary. The Republicans are a ways in a greater extreme dillema. that's already exhibiting that the conservative base of the Republican occasion does not prefer McCain's nomination. So, McCain could have an exceptionally complicated activity of uniting the Republican occasion at the back of him. The greater reasonable Republicans additionally are viewing McCain with skepticism, seeing him merely as an extension of Bush's failed regulations (financial device, Iraq war, unlawful Immigration), and are disheartened to make certain that no longer something will ever exchange if McCain gets elected. yet I understand your situation and your fears, that if the Democratic nomination will nevertheless be fought neck-and-neck interior the advent months, with the suitable nominee in common terms being prevalent slightly a jiffy till now the November known elections, there could be no sufficient time for the full Democratic occasion to reorganize. yet i'm very effective, and that i assure you that that's a ways greater handy to unite the Democrats than that's to unite the Republicans with McCain being their front-runner.
2016-10-03 07:36:01 · answer #2 · answered by bjorne 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. She's the front-runner. That's why she's getting so much attention.
I don't support her, but OF the candidates to choose from on that side, she's the strongest. Who else (if you voted for that party) would be better?
Edwards? He's a tit.
Obama? I know more about the government than Obama for god sakes. T
he other nameless, faceless, "no hope of winning" candidates?
If Hillary didn't stand a real chance of winning, she would not be such a hot topic.
2007-11-03 21:37:07 · answer #3 · answered by Think! 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The longer she stays in and the more debates she is in the better for Republicans.
She will now start getting the hard questions and she will cry an moan about it, then everyone will see she can not handle it.
Just like the last debate, she was pissed off and she danced around the records question blaming everyone but herself for not releasing them.
Could you imagine a Republican giving that answer about the reason for not releasing records???
2007-11-03 21:04:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No as long as she's running Dem's will never get the office I'm sorry my taxes are high enough and social security is in enough trouble without the Dem's dipping into it to fund other agencies again.
Obama should drop out because he told his constitutes he wouldn't run for another office until his term as senator was over he lied to them. So how can we truly trust he isn't lying to us now.
2007-11-03 21:52:11 · answer #5 · answered by lord_he_aint_right_nda_head 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Sounds sharply spotted, to me.
Just not out of the race, but out of the party of course,
the Republicans would have a realistic chance with her,
as without competitiveness there the whole race is no fun.
2007-11-03 21:13:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary should stay in and I don't see her to be that polarizing.
Is she polarizing because she is strong,smart and would make a great President of the United states ? Who threw that
polarizing word in anyway ? I don't think they know what they are talking about.Hillary will veto the ban on stem cell research as soon as she gets in office,she will help save social security,she is all for unions,she wants to keep jobs where they belong in the US,she wants everyone to have a good job with rising wages,she wants everyone to have access to
health care.I don't believe she is polarizing at all.She is
smart,strong,has a good since of humor ect.
2007-11-03 21:54:30 · answer #7 · answered by j.p. 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
The left and the sell outs on the right both need to step aside and will as it is time we the people take back the USA.
2007-11-03 23:27:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. It is much better that she continue to screw up the Dem party in order to give the Rep party a chance.
2007-11-03 21:39:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
She might be polarizing and, on a personal level, I can't stomach the sight of her; however, I feel her running for president is good for the country.
2007-11-03 21:10:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋