please logically evaluate your question and write a valid argument please tell me whats on your mind??
2007-11-03 19:28:24 · 7 answers · asked by mickie1108 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
No. I don't want to see people performing abortions at home, or in the back of tatto shops or in crack houses. Making it illegal won't make it go away, it will just push a dirty practice into the dark where it will get much worse.
2007-11-03 19:31:56 · answer #1 · answered by Ryan F 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A woman is raped and get pregnant, can she have an abortion or should she be forced to carry the result to term? incest? When, where do you draw the line? What right do you have to draw it. What if the woman has to stay in bed in 18 weeks? Who makes the choice? The woman should be allowed to choose.
Consider if you went to bed and woke up. You find that you are attached by a tube to a person in the next bed. A doctor comes in and says you are the only person that can keep the person, a young boy, alive by staying hooked up to him. If you unhook, you will cause the death of the boy, but you have to stay there for 9 months. Or say 6 months, or three or two or 1 month? Would you stay? Leave? Should the goverment be able to tell you what to do?
I support Roe v Wade
2007-11-03 19:48:20 · answer #2 · answered by Songbyrd JPA ✡ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
Point one-it's wrong to kill any human being, even more so a 'baby'.
Point two-the law is unfair. women get all the power under the current law. They can keep or kill the kid at will. The guy just sits there and has to accept whatever she does. They both made the kid(50/50) but the law gives her 100% of the control.
This comes up when two folks do it and have a baby. Guy says great, she says 'no way' and runs off and kills it. The guy does not get to say anything about it.
A new law needs to be made. One that gives EACH parent 50% of the vote. Nothing can be done to the kid unless both parents agree.
And women with the whole 'it's the females body' argument should just not have sex. After all that is what guys who would get stuck paying for the kids for life are told.
Lets hope the New Ultra-Conservitave Suprime Court does this....keeps his fingers crossed.
2007-11-03 19:39:16 · answer #3 · answered by null_the_living_darkness 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Roe vs. Wade is single-handedly responsible for a drop in youth crime in 1990s. Overturning Roe vs. Wade will lead to a matching increase in youth crime in 16 to 18 years.
2007-11-03 19:34:48 · answer #4 · answered by NC 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
no i remember the days when coat hangers were used by women. back alley abortions we should never go backwards;
2007-11-03 19:36:13 · answer #5 · answered by sheilasays 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Long answer "Yes" with a "But"...
Short answer "No" with an "And".
Wayne
2007-11-03 21:34:51 · answer #6 · answered by Wayne 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nope
2007-11-03 19:30:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋