English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-03 17:23:23 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

Did this Q shock you?: "Do you think wise people know that they are wise?" Why did it shock U? Or not?
2 hours ago - 1 week left to answer.
Additional Details
1 hour ago

The Q I asked was deleted by the Yahoo Answer Team.
1 minute ago

Do you think wise people know that they are wise?
In Philosophy - Asked by heeltap - 27 answers

This brlliant Q was arbitrarily deleted by Yahoo an hour after it was asked. on 11-02-2007
1 second ago

Why did they delete it?

2007-11-03 19:51:48 · update #1

Plato was an Aristocrat. Remember that fact when you read any of his dialogues.

2007-11-04 16:36:39 · update #2

4 answers

For those who are curious about Socrates this question is illustrative of the various individual perceptions carefully tended by eristical skill but which real investigation (philosophy) aspires to surmount.

Plato's style of writing informs as much or more than the content of his writing. If we compare this to the manner in which Xenophon and Aristophanes presented Socrates, a sustainable outline begins to emerge. This does not happen before Socrates charms the best part of us, as he charmed the best and brightest young men of Athens, among them Alcibiades and Plato.

For us to engage Socrates to the conclusion of an inquiry is the worst thing that can happen to Yahoo Answers, the dubious group project, and heeltap's tiresome irreverent eristical displays.

2007-11-04 03:53:17 · answer #1 · answered by Baron VonHiggins 7 · 2 3

That's rather tough to answer from what little we truly know about him. Though, I doubt that a man of his standing would be humble. Plato himself viewed the uneducated to be less important than himself, and I would assume he didn't fall to far from Socrates' tree. He may however have portrayed him that way because most people view their idols as infallible people. It would seem odd if Plato wrote that his teacher was rude and harsh.

2007-11-04 01:42:44 · answer #2 · answered by Cato 5 · 2 1

Socrates believed that the Gods had chosen him; placed him on earth with the responsibility to replace ignorance with knowledge. He didn't pay any regard to others' sensitivity, and was often harsh with his debate partners. Even when his life was being threatened, he was joking and fooling around, acting as if nothing really mattered.
I think he was pretty damn well aware of where he stood in the world.

2007-11-04 00:30:06 · answer #3 · answered by SHARON 4 · 0 1

To answer only your main question, Socrates' "humility" was an offence to humanity. No one should take their own life just because others think he should die. He did not make a martyr of himself. That was just a stupid footnote. It is his illogical idea that men are born with all knowledge and that it merely needs to be "brought out" that defines him. There is nothing humble in believing we are all equally full of knowledge.

2007-11-04 06:58:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers