do you think NO sleep is better than 2 hours of sleep?
i do cause then you wake up more tired, he'll never learn
2007-11-03 16:03:01 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
yes, your right you do wake more tired. If your only gonna get 2 hours you might as well stay up!
2007-11-03 16:07:10 · answer #1 · answered by charm1936 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yea i do no sleep is better then 2 hours because u wake up more tired then u would be if u got no sleep
2007-11-04 15:34:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Two hours of sleep is better than no sleep but it is not healthy to get that amount of sleep anyway because you need a full seven or eight hours committed to sleep if you want your body to have enough energy to get through the day.
2007-11-04 02:32:01 · answer #3 · answered by leged56 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I can really get 2 hours, I'll go to sleep. But if I will get any less than 2 hours, I might as well stay up.
2007-11-03 23:06:09 · answer #4 · answered by Rocketmaniac 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For Me, 5 hours is perfect. much less and, I wake up cranky. any more and, I feel sore and, as if I didn't sleep at all.
2007-11-03 23:40:36 · answer #5 · answered by ny21tb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Medically speaking, you should stay awake and go through your daily routine to achieve optimum recovery strength and normal sleep patterns. You can't nap to make-up for lost sleep.
2007-11-03 23:06:32 · answer #6 · answered by Dovey 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, i don't agree.
your body still benefited from the 2 hours you napped whether you felt more tired or not.
2007-11-03 23:07:11 · answer #7 · answered by The French Connection 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think 2 hours is better than none
2007-11-03 23:06:58 · answer #8 · answered by Lizziebanne 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
she'll never learn either but what does that have to do with sleep...
2007-11-03 23:06:21 · answer #9 · answered by Oyoko 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes something is better than nothing
2007-11-03 23:11:36 · answer #10 · answered by Bratzfan4ever 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋