I'm voting for Sen. Clinton because she is the best candidate available to us and I believe she will make a fine President. I tried mightily to figure out your implied connection, but came up empty.
2007-11-03 16:47:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
If I understand your question, the implication is... Because Abe freed the slaves and later black males were given the right to vote (BEFORE women had the right I might add) that he some how has anything to do with Clinton winning the presidency... I'm lost. I don't get the relevance of your question or how these two persons from different eras coincide.
As for Senator Clinton getting my vote, YES. After the last debate and all the rhetoric about her answer to the NY drivers license question I'm locking in. If any one listened to the response from the other candidates, all but one never gave a straight answer to the question (hint, UFOs). And if anyone listened closely, Clinton was only focusing on the opposition party when it came to issues, no attacks on any of the others. Two wrongs don't make it proper (okay, It's supposed to be right, but it's hard for me to use that word these days because of the RIGHT. Which they are not(in the correct sense that is)).
2007-11-03 16:35:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr.D 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Your "question" is just full of the usual "Big Clinton Lies." She hasn't "won the popular vote nationally" unless you count it using the "North Korean counting system" i.e. count votes which were rejected by the DNC rules in Florida and Michigan and even then count only Clinton's vote and give Obama zero. Also then refuse also to count any votes for Obama in the caucus states. THEN you can squeak out a slight Clinton lead. There is NO reputable media or news organization in the world that accepts the "Big Clinton Lie" that she is "ahead in the popular vote." That is something that ONLY Clinton's personal kool-aid drinking Moonies buy into... She did NOT "carry all the BIG states needed," unless you decided to call "BIG states" only those which Clinton won..... She did NOT win Illinois (21), Georgia (15), North Carolina (15), nor did she "win" either Florida (27), or Michigan (17). What is more in many "big" states which she did carry she is now behind Obama in opinion polls, i.e. California Obama is now preferred by 14 points over Clinton despite the fact that she won the primary! "most agree that Republicans have voted for Obama to help McCain win in the fall." just simply another "Big Clinton Lie," It was the campaign started by Rush Limbaugh to get Republicans to cross over and vote for HILLARY that made a big difference in Texas and Ohio and literally saved her bacon in Indiana. Like most of the things claimed by the Hillary "kool-aid drinking Moonies." The facts are the direct opposite of your lies. "Hillary is more electable than Obama." Another of the "Big Clinton Lies" in fact only a couple of polls show Clinton doing better against McCain, others show Obama doing better. Only by "cherry picking" the polls can dishonest liars and cheaters like "Slick *****" make this claim. Obama leads Clinton as the preferred candidate of the Democrats by 10-15%, she has an negative rating of 56% in the country, the highest of a major candidate since the NAZI David Duke in Louisiana so how does the LEAST popular choice become "transformed" into the "more electable?" "period?" Barack is an "inferior person!" Why because hes a "*****?" Look here, he started this primary campaign 30 points behind Clinton, he was a young, BLACK, unknown, first term kid barely old enough to vote. She had 100 MILLION dollars, she had a 3-1 lead in super delegates, she had a popular ex-President for a husband, she had the DNC in her back pocket in fact she was one oif the most powerful Democratic candidates in 100 years. Then he kicked her rich privileged, entitled, butt from Hawaii to Virginia, from Wyoming to Georgia. Yeah he's "inferior" all right! NOT! Suicide for the Democrats would be allowing that spoiled, lying, cheating phoney to use the "Big Clinton Lie Machine" to steal this primary.........
2016-05-27 06:20:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why? Wasn't Lincoln a Republican? Why would that make me vote for a Democrat?
2007-11-03 16:03:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your mommy must be so proud that at 5 years old you can use the computer.
Now go to bed and let the grown ups play
2007-11-03 16:24:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by CFB 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I will vote for Senator Clinton because she is the most competent person running for President.
2007-11-03 16:06:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
You better down a Coors Light and straighten out a bit.
2007-11-03 15:58:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
He did not win the war. The generals did.
2007-11-03 16:01:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I have been told that Lincoln was not the hero that we are taught. You will have to research That for yourself.
I believe Bill Clinton did some traitorous things and was impeached but not thrown out of office.
Why would I vote for Hillary when she probably shares the same ideaology as Bill. No thanks
2007-11-03 16:13:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
lincoln never fought in any war. i'm confused.
2007-11-03 17:39:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by joe 6
·
2⤊
0⤋