Do you think that US should be split into 10 or more parts? Or maybe back to 50 states?

Question

Just like they try to split other countries into small pieces?
How would this affect world balances?

Answer 1

I would be in favor of dissolving a powerful central government that has the power to put the states into a war against their will....think about it, if all the states had to supply troops if the majority of states approved a war...isn't that better than to have a central government more powerful than the states that make it up in total. but then I'm just some Democrat with 2 jobs and a kid living in the middle of a cornfield putting plastic on his windows and wondering how high the heat bills will be this winter.
50 countries or just one, I'm still living in a corn field in one of them

Answer 2

Rather than breaking the country up, I would favor updating the Constitution to address recent federal usurpations (mainly based on court rulings) and return the country to what the founders intended that it should be: "a confederated republic", or a "republic of republics", as they put it. Under that system, the federal government would handle only those matters that deal with interstate and foreign relations. The states would handle everything else internally.

Imagine: instead of fighting over issues like abortion and gay marriage in Congress, and trying to impose one system on the entire country, we could allow states to do their own thing, as determined by the will of their people.

This is basically what Ron Paul wants to do if he is elected president, and that's a major reason why I'm supporting him.

As it stands, I'm afraid that the country will start breaking up soon. We're simply too different from one another to live under one system indefinitely, and too stubborn to give much ground, even when it's in our own interest.

Answer 3

probable, and additionally you already know what i would not be shocked if this credit crunch and the certainty of all this oil replaced into probable calculated before interior the previous due Eighteen Eighties. bear in mind the great bang interior the city Of London and around the worlds different economic centres interior the previous due Eighteen Eighties. those with money are smart those with useful acquaintances, and that i would not placed no longer something previous or previous em Tsutomu Do you relatively think of that Britain will supply up on all that oil that surely, no longer in a million years my buddy, united statesa. or the different united states will ought to take that oil via stress, why do you think of Britain fought so no longer effortless interior the 1st place in 1982 to maintain Falklands British, for loose speech, for freedom, OIL, it replaced into familiar then that there replaced into the potential of enormous reserves of oil interior the sea's surrounding the Falklands Islands, so what makes you think of Britain will supply it up immediately, because of the fact united statesa. needs it, i do no longer think of so. Like I stated, if any united states needs it, they are going to ought to be arranged to take it via stress. i will inform you what i think of will happen, Britain will furnish Argentina an extremely large and rewarding sweetener a sweetener that Argentina will locate very no longer effortless to refuse, and that i will betcha Argentina will take it, and Britain and Argentina will the two make an incredible and rewarding killing.

Answer 4

Are you in one of those secession groups? That thinks the U.S. needs to break apart, into multiple nations? Bad idea. Many nations, along with the world economy would suffer.

Answer 5

It is already 50 independent states. We have just allowed the Federal government to much power..........

Answer 6

As long as you're in a different part than me.

Answer 7

Have you heard of the European union?

Answer 8

Please explain why this sould be considered or is spouting nonsense a normal passtime for you?