English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

According to the Washington Post, several memos have emerged from the desk of Donald Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld wrote as many as fifty to sixty memos a day. His staff called them "snowflakes." In one memo, he urged his staff to "Keep elevating the threat from Iraq." In another, he tells them to "link Iraq to Iran."
In his memos, he called the Middle Easterners "lazy" and said their oil wealth has spoiled them. He warned of future problems with Saudi Arabia.
It sounds very much as though Rumsfeld was a co-conspirator in the selling of the Iraq War. By urging the threat to be "elevated," he is following the command of his superiors, who were certainly doing their own elevating. Should Donald Rumsfeld be prosecuted for War Crimes? Or is he simply another Bush Administration liar who will get away with his dishonesty with no accountability at all?

2007-11-03 09:45:36 · 10 answers · asked by Me, Too 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

10 answers

It's more evidence that this administration wanted to invade Iraq and created a case for going to war when none actually existed. The fact that the new American embassy in Iraq is ten times larger that any American embassy on the planet offers proof that they are planning on governing Iraq for many years.

Their is plenty of evidence that Bush and co. are now using the same methods to justify war with Iran. PErsonally, I think everyone involved in making the case for war with Iraq should be impeached and handed over to the international community to be tried for their war crimes.

The pattern in Washington seems to be to have your underlings fall on their swords when they get caught doing your illegal work and then pardoning and rewarding them later. I'm not sure the international community would be as easy to manipulate in that manner.

2007-11-03 16:16:29 · answer #1 · answered by Guardian 3 · 0 1

I strongly recommend you appraise your self of the discussions between the NSDAP and Palestine interior the mid 30's, the place the Palestinians have been arranged to bypass land to the German Jews so as that they might all be deported there. As Palestine replaced into an English Administered area at that component, an overhang from WW1, the united kingdom placed an business enterprise supply as much as all those discussions. How desperately ironic that the very land which the Palestinians have been offering in '35 replaced into an identical land that in the time of 1948 the presently formed UN forced the united kingdom to furnish over and Israel replaced into created. there is great confusion on the subject of the "very final answer to the Jewish question" lots of what the common public think of they understand and ill recommended books trot out is unquestionably incorrect. The holocaust got here approximately needless to say yet once you study the NSDAP and that's leaders movements, examine Mein Kampf, the holocaust only grew to alter into the only suitable answer because of the fact each and every thing else had long gone incorrect for the Nazi's. Plan one, mid 30's - deliver the German Jews, which replaced into only around 500,000 human beings to Palestine - the united kingdom stopped that. Plan 2 - 1939 till the lack of ability of the conflict on Russian land - deliver all ecu Jews and different different communities they did no longer choose to Siberia. yet of direction, they did no longer income that floor to maintain. via the time Reinhard Heydrich replaced into assassinated in mid 1942 maximum maximum suitable SS and Wehrmacht appropriate brass and officers interior the sector understood that Germany might lose the conflict and have been already searching for the suited way that Germany might desire to come to an settlement with the Russians and the remainder of Europe. besides the reality that 'The Holocaust' as such went on till 1945, the main considerable experience replaced into throughout via 1943, A undesirable time in historic previous, yet interior the chilly easy of day, only yet another undesirable time in historic previous. study the Crusades, and different different acts pre-center an prolonged time. Heydrich replaced into no longer the 1st to think of of "Nacht und Nebel" and the Nazi's via no skill the 1st to think of of non secular pogroms and mass annihilation of 'undesirables.

2016-10-14 22:07:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You are doing the same thing the Democrats have been doing for months - trying desperately to add any validity to the phrase, "lie based war," that you can.
There is no validity. The validity is in the evidence that was so compelling that, at the time the hard decisions had to be made, even the Democrats are quoted as believing that Saddam still possessed chemical arsenals. This is public record.
Really, get over it. Your beating a dead horse - or donkey, as the case may be.

2007-11-03 09:53:54 · answer #3 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1 2

Show me a politician who does not spin the truth to create a certain perception. That's what politics is all about. The sooner you learn that the better.

2007-11-03 09:56:34 · answer #4 · answered by Chef 6 · 0 0

But I bet the fact that the Clintons are working hard to keep correspondences in the archives locked away til after the election doesn't bother you at all.

2007-11-03 09:48:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

what else is new, we knew this all along.
ever since I found out on another matter that the government can lie all it wants, but I have to tell the truth, I haven't got a speck of respect left for them bureaucrats.

2007-11-03 09:59:33 · answer #6 · answered by ati-atihan 6 · 0 1

Things that happen in the past are called history. You can't change them. Things that haven't happened yet are part of the future. Perhaps it is better to concentrate on these things instead.

2007-11-03 09:51:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

So interoffice instructions are now war crimes? I was at least expecting some claim that he absolutely knew we had false intelligence

2007-11-03 09:52:11 · answer #8 · answered by You are all, weirdos. 3 · 1 2

god where does pelosi come up with this stuff. there is no conspiracy, there are no war crimes. grow up and move on...ok?

2007-11-03 09:54:44 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 1

Blah, blah, blah.

2007-11-03 09:47:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers