English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-03 09:28:53 · 3 answers · asked by Mommyof2angels 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

It's interesting that polls on the subject show that people who support term limits generally like their own representatives, but they want the others out of office. The feeling seems to be that if only we can shorten the time people are in office, the more easily the balance of power will shift our way (whichever way that is). In practice, that hasn't happened at all. In states with term limits, their has been a troubling shift of power out of the legislatures and into the hands of lobbyists. Now that few legislators stick around long enough to really know their jobs, they are dependent on the expertise of people who have agendas of their own. We're seeing more legislation actually written by corporations and introduced in exchange for campaign contributions. In my opinion, regular elections are a sufficient limitation. If people are happy with their representatives, they should be able to hang onto them.

2007-11-03 09:41:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes. The longer they are in, the more power they get. I was under the impression that each legislator had one vote for each item. Then I read an article about a freshman Senator who indicated that the "new guys" were often coherced by these older members to vote certain ways or be "blackballed. Our government at work.

2007-11-03 16:38:00 · answer #2 · answered by sensible_man 7 · 1 0

Yes.

2007-11-03 16:31:11 · answer #3 · answered by steven c 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers