That the newest missing mother's name is extremely close to another mother who went missing a few years ago? should we screen all Peterson men for psychotic tendencies?
2007-11-03 08:11:56 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
it is a copy cat.
2007-11-03 11:04:49 · answer #1 · answered by theo c 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, why not?
After six months of listening to the Obama/Osama wits and wags, I'm beginning to understand how much more important a name is than the person attached to it.
Its either the Peterson name or the fact that both women are/were mothers. Is there something spooky about motherhood?
2007-11-03 09:30:47 · answer #2 · answered by justa 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This has just been a bad week for Petersons. The teacher accused of running off with her student in the last couple of days is named Peterson as well. Who knew there were so many Petersons?
But, to answer your question, yes that is weird indeed!
2007-11-03 08:16:50 · answer #3 · answered by KRR 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes, extremely weird. Screen all of the Petersons? Now thats funny!!!
2007-11-03 08:25:30 · answer #4 · answered by Onery 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As human become a material of the marketing, everything is possible including screening for weird. I do not know f human being head toward death of the culture or the begin of a new one
2007-11-03 08:39:41 · answer #5 · answered by Roze 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sad that this has to have any ones name to it and it happens all the time.
And why cant people make better choices and see who the person really is from the start. Ever here the phrase red flag?
2007-11-03 15:36:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A name doesn't mean anything. Especially if you studied the history immigration at Ellis Island, people's names were often changed to something easier and more American. Thus people with the same last name don't even have to be related.
2007-11-03 08:16:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes it does We should screen all men except for me and I am an exception to the rule
2007-11-03 16:47:43 · answer #8 · answered by David T 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is weird.
I find this to be a GREAT example of why we shouldn't let Hillary be President. Clintons tend to abuse interns if I am not mistaken...at least Bill's last name was not Peterson...
2007-11-03 08:35:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes it's a weird coincidence.
2007-11-03 08:16:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
weird, well I don't know about screening but it is quite a coincidence.
2007-11-03 08:15:34 · answer #11 · answered by Ancient Warrior DogueDe Bordeaux 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋