I found it that even though women may want to marry a provider they never love him passionately because they realize he is a voluntary slave. Only the Casanova type enjoys the true passion from women. Do you agree?
2007-11-03 07:28:59 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
Amore.
2007-11-03 08:59:09 · answer #1 · answered by Marguerite 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I was married to a man who was a drug addict and only did what he had to do to get by for himself. I had left him after wasting 10 years of my life on him. I have found someone who is a great provider. The closer we get, the more passionate we get. He was just so used to women using him, and I was so used to men using me, that it has taken us some time to get used to eachother. He was never a sexual person before, he was more into working and not playing, as I was not until my ex-husband taught me a few things. So, now knowing what I know, and finding out what types of things turn on my current husband, we are happy in all areas of our lives and we fall more and more in love with eachother every day. I think it all has to do with how compatible the two really are. So, do I agree? I agree that some women are that way. Am I? No.
2007-11-03 07:45:27 · answer #2 · answered by truely_loved 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
women persons fall for the two or, reckoning on their character. to ward off the blunders of falling into the provider type, do no longer furnish for the period of courtship and notice how she loves or treats then you definitely. or only take a raffle and furnish in any case, and you're starting to be the means to seek deep down your fears if somebody extremely is there for you and not what you're able to do. Oh yeah, attempt looking somebody who's financially good as nicely and isn't any longer consistently conversing approximately money. it extremely is a robust concept.
2016-09-28 06:31:10 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a tough one. I wanted a lover when I met my husband. Now that we have made some major decisions in our lives, what I need is a provider (we plan to adopt special needs kids, and we know it would be best to have a stay at home parent to give our babies the best chance in this world - and he doesn't want to stay home). But I'm not willing to give up the lover to have the provider. I'll work if I have to (I work now, and will continue to work after we bring home our children, if it's necessary).
2007-11-03 07:56:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I dont know that they are exclusive of each other. I was lucky to find both in my husband. However if I was given the choice I would rather have to work to help support the family than to give up great lovemaking. At least I'll go to work happy.
2007-11-03 07:39:15 · answer #5 · answered by Diane M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Lover - these days a girl's got to be able to fend for herself and get into the 21st century and not depend on a man!
2007-11-03 07:37:10 · answer #6 · answered by Rachel B 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am attracted to a lover. I can provide for myself. My hubby and I make the same amount of money, and he's quite the lover! (We've been together 20 years!!)
2007-11-03 07:34:02 · answer #7 · answered by zen 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would never be attracted to a Provider when I would never need his provisions. I'll take the Lover, but just for an hour or two. (smirk)
2007-11-03 11:53:28 · answer #8 · answered by Rio Madeira 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Wow!
So you're completely incapable of seeing ANY humans as individuals, and see them only in terms of "one of two stereotypes" (which, by the way don't even exist as people).
That's amazing. I get that the sexists aren't capable of seeing women as human beings, but that a guy is incapable of seeing GUYS as human beings seems really odd.
I have known very few women who've thought of "getting a provider" rather than "falling in love".
No, the Casanova type doesn't enjoy the true passion from women -- but they do get a lot of sex and some infatuation.
Most women aren't mentally defective people who think there are only 2 kinds of men in the world; nor are most primarily interested in a man's wallet.
The number one thing women cite in every poll or study that's ever been done is: sense of humor. Intelligence and education are also high; and looks; and heart, character, social conscience, etc.
More men than women are visually-oriented when it comes to attraction. Most women are personality and character-oriented. (A man you love looks good to you, rather than falling in love with a man's looks, if you're capable of following that concept.)
Young women fall hard for lots of really wrong men, and tend to wear their hearts on their sleeves. When they mature, they are more likely to fall for Human beings. In a mature relationship, people tend to not hang all over each other in public.
How do you know how women acquaintances, or women you pass on the street, or al the rest of the women of the world feel about their husbands?
You seem to get your view of the world from movies; they just ain't accurate. So stop watching Casablanca and look at the real world.
2007-11-03 08:07:13 · answer #9 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Lover as i am more than capable of providing for myself
2007-11-03 07:36:13 · answer #10 · answered by thelma_layton 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋