Against. For all the obvious reasons: Iraq had nothing whatsoever to do with 9-11 or Al-queda and, had no WMDs. And Bush and the government knew that. They lied about that just like they are still lying about 9-11.
Just because a great number of people refuse to see that the official version of the events of 9-11 is so full of holes that it makes no sense at all does not make the official version the truth.
Whoever is responsible for 9-11 bet on the apathy of our people and so far they were right. Thank God there are people out there who are not apathetic and are willing to fight to get the truth out.
The simplest of research will show anybody how fishy the official story is.
1/ PA: Compare any photo of a plane crash with that of Flight 93 and if you still think a plane crashed in PA, you have got to be blind.
2/Pentagon: Look at photos of the pentagon after the "plane (?)" hit but before the upper floors came down and if you still think a jet of the size of the one that supposedly hit went though that small a hole, once again you are blind.
3/WTC: Building demolition professionals from around the world (and that includes American ones) have explained why the only way those 3 buildings came down the way they did is through a controlled demolition effort. And yes there were 3 buildings to come down that day. Why is Building 7 left out of the official version? Why is Building 7 still standing when a news anchor announces that it has come down?
I certainly hope we can link the evidence to the real culprit and, this one time, I will be for the death penalty.
In the meantime, I wish all the people who claim they support our soldiers would do a bit more than say it and stick a ribbon on their cars. That doesn't help them much.
Work at bringing them home by bringing out the truth about 9-11.
2007-11-03 07:43:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well this war is not about oil or democracy, it's about prophetic prophecy.You have to understand the origin of where it all started. The history is in the bible. Just like the Crucifixion of the Christ. We are all but pawns in a play, and the battle is between good and evil.Also you can either believe it or do the research. Choose wisely what side of the road you stand on.
2007-11-03 07:53:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by edb_guitar 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am against the war. It was trumped up by the Jews in the white house they wanted this war as they seen Iraq as a threat to Israel's security. This war was started on false information. There is a civil war going now so who do our soldiers kill?
America has the whole mid east hating us so we will see an increase of terror.
2007-11-03 07:35:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by lonetraveler 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
in any war that's been fought through the ages, innocent men, women and children have been killed.....mostly by accident or they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. that is not to say that there are isolated incidents on the part of friend or foe, killing for the sake of killing. that in itself should not be a reason to be for or against any war.
as far as me being for or against "the" war, i can think of more pros than i can cons for a reason for "the" war.
2007-11-03 07:22:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by cliffordw hippiefied ol fart 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
That is a tough question, but we are there now. No more blaming Bush...all the Senators voted for it, and the UN sanctioned IRAQ 17 times...so based on the information we had and other world leaders, including the UK, Australia, Germany etc..we decided to put an end to Sadam.
Now, they have democracy, women vote, etc...War is always terrible,,but we did the best we knew at the time!
Now, we just support the troops.
Violence seems to be curbing, who knows?
2007-11-03 07:04:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by neveragain 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
maximum political figures do turn-flop. it is not merely McCain. look at historic past and notice what different ones have replaced their opinion on so lots greater suitable than McCain. And--gasp!---merely approximately all are democrats. Dont blame each and every thing on Republicans simply by fact democrats are not precisely angels the two.
2016-10-03 06:25:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Erika 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one is FOR war...but considering since the first plane hijacking in the 1970's we have been subjected to 30 years of islamic facist terrorism in the west; it's about time we did something about it. Either Islam has a reformation, to peacefully accept other religions as most all religions have, or it will be forced upon them.
2007-11-03 07:27:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I support the invasion of Afghanistan and the invasion of Iraq because of the direct link between Saddam Hussein and Al-Quaida which was proven under the Clinton Administration by then Secretary of Defense Cohen.
1. It is not because of the oil.
2. Nerve Gas was found in Iraq (on the W.M.D. list).
3. Hussein funded the terrorists who attacked the US.
And I strongly feel that the U.S. should have invaded Iran years ago because of their blatant financial, military, and personal support of terrorism.
The U.S. military should not leave Iraq until the job is done.
2007-11-03 07:06:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
I am all for the war, That war is keeping the terrorist over there. That said, you should know that the war is going to go on for years, because of the libs and people who constantly whine about bringing our soldiers home. All this whining has done is to embolden the terrorist, and show them that the libs do not have what it takes to fight for the people of America. So you go ahead and vote in one of your anti war libs, and then when you see the attacks on our soil start, you can try using that same pull em out argument on the terrorist.
2007-11-03 07:21:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Scrappy52 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
Sorry don't agree....War is for OUR FREEDOM! if you don't want the freedom, you can just leave the country. There is a lot more of the Iraqi's beheading and killing our loved ones than the other way around.
2007-11-03 07:10:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by ♥STREAKER♥©℗† 7
·
5⤊
3⤋