The world would still respect the US,
2007-11-03 06:55:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Edge Caliber 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
we are nonetheless combating in Afghanistan. No reducing or working has happened there so a procedures... The murderers of 9-11 have been burned to no longer something whilst they crashed the planes that they had hyjacked into the twin towers of NYC. The masterminds of it are unknown. Osama Bin weighted down, seen the chief of Al-Qadea became rumored to be in Afghanistan, secure by using the Taliban, a central authority with many admited ties to terrorist businesses. Bin weighted down is yet to be stumbled on. Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, who claims to have been the mastermind in the back of the 9-11 assaults is in U.S. custody after his catch in Pakistan in 2003. No solid evidence has surfaced that Saddam Hussein proved an immenent possibility to U.S. protection, that he had harbored terriorists or their businesses, or posessed WMD's. undesirable intelligence and undesirable judgement enable us to to attack that usa to overthrow Saddam Hussein. it extremely is going to no longer have been completed. regardless of if, the conflict we've.. this conflict on Terror, is a conflict which will stretch a protracted time, it extremely is a conflict that has been happening for no less than 2 a protracted time in the previous 9-11. in common terms the enemy became so hidden, we did no longer comprehend what became in progression. we are no longer at conflict with Iraq, that conflict ended years in the past. we are at conflict with a military that has no host usa, and the main significant battlegrounds ensue to be in Iraq and Afghanistan. If we go away the middle east this conflict won't end. It started in the previous we went there, why would leaving end it? The enemy demands we abandon Israel as a pal and best pal, and that they carry us notably to blame for any substitute to their custom they discover undesirable. we will not and should no longer be compelled to desert Israel, and there is no longer something we are able to do to ward off golbalization... or would desire to do. it extremely is a foul ingredient that we at the instant are in this Grand conflict, and that's gloomy that it has escalated lots over the previous few years, yet right here it is. as long because of the fact the enemy is led by using hateful adult men who will do something to extra beneficial their radical agendas, and as long as we are led by using persons which will galvanize and anger the enemy, this conflict will pass on devoid of end. for each three hundred and sixty 5 days we galvanize them, it extremely is going to require ten years of allaying them to even wish to discover peace.
2016-09-28 06:27:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your summary of events in Afghanistan had the U.S. not invaded Iraq is very idealistic and optimistic. It doesn't take into account the likely exodus of terrorists into Afghanistan much the way they have been drawn to Iraq - and the also very likely monetary and weapons support for the terrorists in Afghanistan from their neighboring countries, including Iraq.
Let's face it - the Middle East is a hornets' nest - and like it or not, the events of 9/11 have made it necessary that these militants have to be confronted - and everyone knows what happens when you stir up a hornets' nest. The Islamic radicals have been provoking their infamous Jihad now for over 25 years by slaughtering thousands of innocent people - they have succeeded, now it is our turn to demonstrate just what consequences for ones actions mean.
Again I quote Albert Einstein:
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing."
2007-11-03 07:35:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
I totally agree with your estimations of what would have been accomplished if we had stayed focused on Afghanistan.
2007-11-03 06:59:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by mollyflan 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Osama would have already been fed to the hogs, and many of his followers demoralized.
other countries wouldn't be acting like we have no credibility.
2007-11-03 06:55:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Boss H 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I agree with most of those points, except one: Osama would not have been captured.
2007-11-03 06:57:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How would this have worked out if clinton took Bin Laden when he was offered to him???????????????
Notice how I do not capitalize clintons name????
2007-11-03 06:57:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋