Universal Healthcare shall be mandatory regardless of the political system. A healthy society is the base for a healthy country.
2007-11-03 06:36:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you're a hundred% suitable. 19d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb8s to what's incorrect with socialist something - there is Kolyma - one the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic's dying camps and Buchenwald - between the dying camps of the 19d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb8ational Socialist German workers party [19d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb819d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb819d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb819d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb8]. The Left desires to allocate aspects politically so as that they might scouse borrow them. working example, in 19d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb8ustralia, the gay lobby is in a position to get retrovirals for loose, yet no person else can; the feminists could have drugs for breast maximum cancers for loose, yet adult men can't have it for prostate maximum cancers. there are entire swathes of medicine that would only be had in case you get a bureaucratic approval, no count how lots money you have. Sylvester Stallone replaced into prosecuted in 19d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb8ustralia for having some DHE19d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb8, something so you might purchase over-the-counter right here. Socialism grants administration and it facilitates life and dying judgements to be put in the palms of socialists in the event that they have the well being equipment. the skill to exterminate your enemies under the guise of doing the common public good surely makes you an 19d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb8merican Stalin, with out any of the unfavorable popularity. maximum individuals do no longer understand what they might supply up via socialized drugs, because of the fact we've not considered what happens in those different countries. Castro apparently sufficient, hates homosexuals and confines those with 19d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb819d82b8f74c2dfeaaf48544b1fbddb8DS in concentration camps. Such are the powers conceded via quarantine and socialized well being schemes.
2016-10-14 21:36:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The word "socialist" in relation to universal healthcare is a misnomer applied by neo-cons who could care less about the needs of the middle-class and poor of our country. They fear universal healthcare because the system is already corrupt and benefits only the wealthy. The only time things change in this country is when the rich are affected. If they received the quality of care the poor do, they would be screaming for reform. Unfortunately, that will never happen here.
P.S. The greatest example of "socialistic" healthcare is the healthcare benefits of congressmen, senators, the president and supreme court justices. They get the best of what's around at the taxpayers expense. They should have to pay for their own insurance like most hard working Americans. But then, what do I know? I'm just another commie-lib who thinks things like justice for all and equal access to things like healthcare are a good idea.
2007-11-03 06:00:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think one of the major concerns is that people simply don't understand 'Big Government' and how it works vs. Small Government. Health care means more taxes, to pay for Health Care... well, a person is going to put that money out anyway...if they have health care, or a visit to a medical profession. The question is: Do you want to pay for Health Care out of your pocket, or pay the Government to provide you Health Care? Some people would prefer putting their money into a 4% CD...oh well.
One vein of thinking I have is that Private Health is they likely to be more corrupt, being they have no real checks and balances? With the Government, the Constitution at least allowed for Agencies to check up on one another. Now, I do believe the Constitution does not call for Big Government... but The Constitution IS for the People, thus, if the People want something, is it unconstitutional? My thought is it is not, IF the people vote for it.
Another crazy factor I see in the fear of Socialism is that it equates to Communism. Socialism does not equate to Communism, why do people zero in on the absolute most negative form of whatever? Socialism is in many non-communist countries....do the research. I am familiar alittle bit with socialism as my mother was born in Scotland, raised in NZ. One of her brothers, born in Ireland, retained a dual citizenship so he could return the UK to have his dental work done. He couldnt afford it here on a fixed income.
Can we trust the Government with anything, I think is a better question. Afterall, we are 'trusting' them with our lives right now. And I am very concerned about the continued mishaps involving Nuclear Subs, warheads, and the like... and this Adminstration is concerned with the Middle East? Wait.. let us worry about our own Nuclear Warheads. I am almost waiting to hear that we dropped a nuke on ourselves!
Socialism may not be a bad idea, but the best thing anyone can do to find if it really suits them is educate themselves.
2007-11-03 06:03:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Elaine 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm afraid of the fact that is does not work... why do you canadians come to the US when you have to wait years for a surgial procedure? In Italy they wait in line for hours to see a doctor that they like,
2007-11-03 07:09:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by bob t 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Government should never be given that much responsibility in a "free" society. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
And universal healthcare is the farthest thing from a good idea.
2007-11-03 05:47:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
No....... Universal health care does not work in any country that has it. Government is less qualified to manage health care than almost any other organization.
2007-11-03 05:48:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
more because the social security problem, the FEMA problem, FBI/ATF problem (Waco, Ruby ridge), CIA (we didnt see 9/11 coming, Iraq has WMD) problem
I dont think the american government runs any program well.
2007-11-03 06:05:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Why not at all if Hitlery, Reid, Pelozi, the CEO of United Health care.... all agree it's good for us. Gee, I see no reason not to.
2007-11-03 13:45:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by R J 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
i want LESS government involvement in my life....not more...
and i don't want the government telling me which doctor i have to go too...which hospital...what kind of care i need...
i want my doctor to make those decisions...
government has no business in my personal life... and i think the relationship between me and doc is very personal indeed..
socialism doesn't work...
2007-11-03 05:48:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋