Based upon her own words:
a. Higher taxes.
b. Socialized health care.
c. The UN making all of our foreign policy decisions.
2007-11-03 05:35:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
The wars (yes there are TWO) would end; the disabled veterans would be taken care of, and every person could have affordable health care. Did I mention that healthy people would no longer be able to live off welfare from the cradle to the grave?
Some people say that Hillary supports abortion, but I've never known a US President to throw a pregnant woman upon an examination table, spread her legs, and make her have an abortion. You can't perform an abortion if you don't have a volunteer on the table.
Goooooooo, Hillary!
2007-11-03 05:46:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Laredo 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, if Hillary gets elected one thing she might try to do is get affordable health care such as National Health Insurance.
Republicans and big Insurance companies would hate this and immediately begin to trash her and the idea.
Since the Repugnants would condiser this horrible; I would be for it.
The average American, however, would consider it a really good thing.
I'm with the average American on this one.
2007-11-03 05:45:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A lot of us will apply for Canadian citizenship.
Seriously, the main thing is the swelling of an already bloated bureaucracy. Economic chaos as she raises taxes, creates all sorts of make-work programs to create government jobs, which are the least productive and most expensive jobs in the country. A real "politically correct" style that will probably play heck with our First Amendment rights, and regulations of all sorts that will stifle investment, creativity and enterprise generally.
Not to mention we will all have to get used to the changes in coping with a dominantly female government, because she will undoubtedly have to give patronage jobs to the people from the so-called feminist movement who worked to make this a gender issue. Anyone who was guilt-tripped into voting for her because she is a woman will be in for four years of "women are superior" rhetoric for their sins.
Serve them right, I will say from my hidy-hole in Canada.
2007-11-03 12:33:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by auntb93 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I voted for President Clinton in his second term based on the improvements for the military. If she was the driving force behind those decisions then I see good decisions in many facets for the military. She has already come to realize that this war is necessary, and I believe will continue to try to collect allies from the Middle East countries. That would give this country credibility from someone other than our own countrymen who tell the world our country sucks. I personally will not vote for her there are many other issues that stick in my mind one is Boarder and Homeland Security. She gets very low marks in an area we should be concentrating on while our troops are overseas in war. This subject should be resolved before they return and I do not believe if she were in charge it would be so.
2007-11-03 05:37:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by rance42 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Higher taxes and a further escalation of the Iraq War! Yet, is anyone better?
2007-11-03 22:14:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by peacenegotiator 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
People get real! Our enemy is Islamic muslims who beat their women, cover them from head to toe, do not let them vote and will never talk to women concerning government affairs. Islamic women are second class citizens in the nations. Do you think Islamic men will negotiate anything with a woman?
To me Condoleeza Rice is a joke because these Islamic men do not listen to her. I laughed at Pelosi visiting the Syrian President.
Get a strong General who can slap these Islamic presidents around and they'll listen to him. These are warring, fighting and enemies of anything Christian or Jewish, men.
Please, please, please try to know your enemy.
2007-11-03 05:45:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jeancommunicates 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
more of the same. Over spending and a sliding dollar maybe a war with Iran or Pakistan if AIPAC commands it.
2007-11-03 05:34:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I'm most worried about higher taxes and increased government influence over my life. Like forcing me to to buy health insurance claiming that it is somehow for the common good.
2007-11-03 05:33:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brian 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
I think she would pull out of Iraq too soon and then the world would see another blood bath like that which happened in Vietnam after the Commie North illegally invaded and took the south. Worse case...Iran gets its nuke and uses it on...US? Israel?
Very, very bad for millions of people, don't you think?
2007-11-03 05:36:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
3⤊
3⤋