Trying to not be insulting, more or less just playing around.
2007-11-03 04:49:24 · 29 answers · asked by Spartacus 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I never thought I would abstain from a vote but I would be forced to. There isn't even a lesser evil in these options........
2007-11-03 04:52:25 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 7⤊ 5⤋
Hilary or Bush = null set (both want war)
Bush or a reformed Bill Clinton = Bill Clinton
Hilary or Obama = undecided
Hilary or Giuliani = no opinion
Hilary or Ron Paul = Ron Paul, provided
Hilary or Romney = no opinion
Hilary or McCain = does it really matter
Hilary or a reformed Bush Senior = Bush Senior
Hilary is a very accomplished person, yet she scares people. I can live with Hilary, if she were versed and an expert on intl relations and affairs. This is something that Bill is good at.
Hilary alienates too many people and she doesn't want to understand the solution to the Iraq War, so she goes along with Bush. Is there anyone good???
FIRST EDIT:
Perhaps a McCain-Clinton ticket would be good? N'est pas?
.
2007-11-03 22:23:09 · answer #2 · answered by peacenegotiator 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Considering there is a Hitler wannabe in office now trying to start an Islamofasicts war, I would say Hillary....
2007-11-03 05:10:06 · answer #3 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Tough call. One is the most evil entity ever to walk upon the face of the earth.
And the other one is Adolf Hitler.
2007-11-03 05:02:50 · answer #4 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton
2007-11-03 04:52:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 6⤋
Yes, conservatives, it IS sinking in that your abandonment of the Constitution for your love of Corporate Fascism has led to the stark reality that your next emperor may well be Hillary "Unitary Executive" Clinton.
Who will she be spying on?
Who will she declare an enemy combatant?
What will her signing statements allow her to do?
All hail our next serial monarch Hillary Clinton!
2007-11-03 05:03:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hitler would have my vote. He brought economic stability and unity to Germany. He also knew how to deal with troublesome immigrants. Just playing too. but I would not vote for Hillary Clinton.
2007-11-03 04:55:20 · answer #7 · answered by f1mudvayne29 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
hmm the same world conquest agenda. Shes pretty much threatened to attack several countries. Still probably all in all Clinton.
2007-11-03 05:13:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Adolf..was a bad man...the Clintons are the source for all evil in the world.
2007-11-03 04:55:07 · answer #9 · answered by I Laugh At Morons 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
What are you talking about, we already have Hitler in power now. He just changed his name to Bush.
2007-11-03 05:12:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The cons would vote for Hitler.....they voted for Bush ,and there really isn't much difference between the 2.
2007-11-03 05:01:44 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋