Now how pointless of a question of this??? The answer is quite obviously 'NO'. To answer any other questions you may have, the Pope is of the Catholic faith, bears go to the woods to defecate and pigs are incapable of self propelled flight....
2007-11-03 04:21:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by eriverpipe 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
1
2017-01-21 06:23:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It all depends on the specifics of the court case. A common scenario is the mother demands that the visits with the father be supervised out of concern for the safety of the child.
It may be necessary to go to court continually so that the the visitation schedule, compliance, etc. can be monitored. If the mother is not allowing visitation that is specified in a court order or in an agreement, you need to have legal papers drawn up to address this in court.
The court may ask what reasons the mother had to refuse contact. What reasons will the mother offer? If she has a decent reason to refuse contact (like intoxication), you may decide to opt out of the pissing contest that will ensue in court and try to work with the mother so she will allow visits next time. The courts can be time consuming and frustrating.
Good luck!
2007-11-03 04:27:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by jsb3t 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Every answer so far is wrong in practice. I am a loving father who had to go through 6 years of Court before I got a contact order. The mother can disregard all Court Orders with no fear of any retribution. The mother can do no wrong! Every false allegation by the mother is taken as gospel. It's not just Guilty until proven innocent. You're guilty with no opportunity to prove you are innocent, just on the mother's say so.
This is what happens. From the mother refusing to allow contact, it takes about 7 months to get to Court. Then the mother says that the child has forgoten the father and would be terrified of going off with a stranger, so contact is set once evry 2 weeks for 1 hr at a contact centre, which is in fact supervised contact as if Dad cannot be trusted to be alone with his child. All under the control of the mother who can sobatage each meeting by tyelling the child that Daddy wants to steal her and she will never see Mummy again to insure that the staff at the Centre see a terrified hysterical child the instance she sees Dad.
This goes on for about 2 yrs before the mother finally has to agree to unsupervised contact. Again 1hr every 2 weeks under the control of the mother. Took me 6 yrs to get a contact order and cost me everything I owned. Mum of course is on Public funding and pays nothing so she just tries to drag it out. If she can drag it out until you give up or run out of money and have to give up then you will never see your child again. This is the only system where you are presumed to be a danger to your own child and have to spend up to 5 yrs and all your savings trying to prove that you will not harm your own child. It's a racket with Solicitors, Cafcass officers all getting rich.
Everything is on Mums side. When once in a blue moon, you get something in your favour, Mum just ignores it and nobody does anything about it. When I kept taking her back to Court because she would not comply with a Court Order in my favour, the Judge "resolved" the situation by altering his judgement to the one that Mum had wanted in the 1st place.
Mum can do no wrong!
Dad can do no right!
2007-11-03 05:02:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Wunout O 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
The mother is in violation of the court order, the father then has to document these violations by calling the police and making reports. Then after several violations the father can take the mother to court for contempt.
In the mean time the children suffer.
2007-11-03 04:22:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dawg Star 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
If the father is telling the mother in advance when he will pick his child up according to court guideline, then she is going against the court order by not allowing him to see his child.My ex took his court order with him every time he went to pick his son up. If the Mother did not allow it, he called the police and reported it.Usually, they showed up at her house to fill out the report. After about 6 months, he went to the prosecutor's office and filed a complaint.It saved him attorney fees.He now sees his son regularly and has been warned if she is found in contempt again, she might lose her custody.
2007-11-03 04:30:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Harley Lady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there is a court order, and the wife tries to go against it she will be violating that order. If she has fears, that have not been addressed she needs to tell her lawyer and or the judge. Otherwise she could risk her own contact with the child.
2007-11-03 04:20:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by evil_kandykid 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Legally, the father was given contact rights through the court's jurisdiction. The mother has no legal right to refuse contact whatsoever.
2007-11-03 04:20:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by *miss k 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
i do not study CA guidelines, yet in certain states, if this hasn't grow to be for all, they could placed a "body attachment" on him once his CS arrears attain a particular volume. A case in yet another state talked about a guy the following (I stay in AR)... he changed into in arrears of something contained in the community of $10,000 and they were given him (attachment changed into from MD or MN) and extradited him back at the same time as his heritage examine changed into flagged. you would search for suggestion from the DA about that or once you've something like we've (there is an workplace of kid help Enforcement) and also you would even see about contacting the DA about charging him with contempt, because you've a court order he's violating. There are also certain businesses that would want to help you, for a fee, to capture him (inner most). also, you could placed a seizure order adversarial to ANY tax refunds he receives. His tax identity (social safe practices wide style) shows up on a tax style, his money receives taken and despatched to you.
2016-10-23 08:01:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Happens all the time! Father gets a court order. It's just a piece of paper.
Next step: File for a contempt hearing. That's how father ENFORCES piece of paper.
2007-11-03 04:21:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by peggy m 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No the mother should obey the court order. And if she doesn't, go back to court and complain, and the court will likely take the child away from mom. You can also show your order to the police to make them help enforce it.
2007-11-03 04:21:09
·
answer #11
·
answered by Flatpaw 7
·
1⤊
0⤋