2007-11-02 18:32:14 · 7 answers · asked by rontriplett1 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
NOPE!!!
2007-11-02 18:34:21 · answer #1 · answered by Milton a.k.a. the building pyro 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because of the stadium costs and the absence of public money, N.F.L. Commissioner Paul Tagliabue has called the business community's involvement a ''surrogate'' for the use of tax dollars.
Steve Tisch, the Giants' chairman and executive vice president and a member of the Los Angeles working group, said, ''We think it is important to have a team in Los Angeles, but the conditions have to be right, the economics have to work, and the business community has to be strongly involved.''
If a site is chosen in the next few months, the league will have two years before it is obligated to designate a team that will play there. That would provide time to decide whether to expand or to allow an existing team to move.
2007-11-03 04:02:55 · answer #2 · answered by Jay 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ted didn't get your question... haha
No. There is no talks of any expansion team in the NFL.
The only talk of any expansion team is in the NBA and it's not an expansion really but Sonics might move to Oklahoma City... Not like there gin to be any better... but whatever.
2007-11-03 02:20:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe the Bills have a game scheduled for Toronto next year. Very interesting?
2007-11-03 01:36:05 · answer #4 · answered by TedEx 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None that I'm aware of. But, there have been talks about the Vikings possibly moving to Toronto
2007-11-03 05:31:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why bother, Da Bears are the only team neccesary.
2007-11-03 01:36:25 · answer #6 · answered by The dude 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they were talikng about putting one in Mexico...that game last year sold 110k tickets.
2007-11-03 11:56:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋