2007-11-02 17:34:17 · 5 answers · asked by kamelåså 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No, but it's the best of the worst. It has its problems too. The problems with other arrangements is that the public is wholly at the mercy of those in power. Sometimes they might have someone great in power. But often not, they don't, and then they have little recourse.
So overall, yes. It's not perfect, but it's the best we have.
2007-11-02 17:42:32 · answer #1 · answered by T J 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Benevolent dictatorships have done well economically. In the US, democracy is transforming to corpratacracy (rule by corporations) and that does very well economically for those earning their incomes from their wealth.
So it depends what you mean by feasable.
2007-11-03 00:38:54 · answer #2 · answered by snarkysmug 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Considering that the US is a REPUBLIC, I am not quite sure what you are asking. A Democracy is one of the worst ways.
2007-11-03 00:57:57 · answer #3 · answered by Fedup Veteran 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not but it's the best one we've got so far. Problem is it's not true democracy but an undercover tyranny.
2007-11-03 12:08:27 · answer #4 · answered by Der weiße Hexenmeister 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The theory is good but getting it to work is hard.
2007-11-03 00:39:27 · answer #5 · answered by Adeptus Astartes 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋