English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

Riskier in which sense? The 20-year has more price risk. If interest rates rise, the price of the bond will fall more than the price of the one-year.

But the one year has more reinvestment risk. If interest rates fall, then you have to reinvest at a lower rate and may not meet your investment objective.

If your investment horizon is for one year, then the 20-year treasury is much more risky. But if your investment horizon is 20-years, then the one-year treasury is much riskier.

Most people only think about price risk -- so would say that the 20-year is riskier. Those people are not thinking things through.

2007-11-02 19:20:10 · answer #1 · answered by Ranto 7 · 1 1

20 year because interest rate risk will affect the price more than for a shorter term. They're both safe from default.

2007-11-03 00:52:07 · answer #2 · answered by jeff410 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers