English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

She's the queen mother of the militant left, protected and babied by the news and entertainment media, never asked a difficult question until Tim Russert nailed her in the last debate. She has a 50% unfavorable rating that is NOT getting better with time. That means she's unelectable.

Democrat party insiders have been nervous about her "coronation" as the Democrat presidential candidate in '08, and now that she was finally held accountable in the debates, she's been exposed.

Slick Willie can't help her, because she's a clod. The DNC and the loony left at moveon.org etc won't support her because she doesn't push their agenda.

Her shot is over, and the people are moving on.

2007-11-02 14:40:32 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Media & Journalism

To Fredrick M

There's no comparison to Hillary and Nixon. Even Nixon's biggest detratctors said he was a brilliant man and a brilliant politician. Hillary is a joke as a politician, and everybody knows it, especially those in the Democrat party who want the WH in '08.

2007-11-02 17:42:49 · update #1

To RoVale

The "record deficits" you refer to are among the biggest lies told to and believed by the unwitting public. The current deficit is under 2% of the GDP, which is, by all reasonable standards, excellent. If you only read the New York Times and their imitators around the country, you'll remain horribly misinformed.

2007-11-02 17:46:50 · update #2

8 answers

None what-so-ever in the world ..And the world can see thru her latest scam to sail to the White House without ever answering a question by pretending that the big boys are picking on girl . She needs to quit acting like a junk yard dog and loose a few years to convince anybody she' ever was a girl . I think John Edwards is more of a girly man than Mrs Clinton could pretend to be .

2007-11-02 15:21:39 · answer #1 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 3 2

Maybe a fraud may be off the mark. But you are quite correct about the press catering to her. She never got the tough questions. She was above that. She thinks she's the heir to the throne next, and the press will put down the red carpet for the journey. Tim Russert may disappear shortly, because he crossed a Clinton. She is not at all tolerant of people that challenge her or are perceived to be in the way. The Clinton's are the political (U.S.) record holders for the most number of witnesses to die suddenly, or leave the country. I wouldn't want to be on the Clinton hit list. Hopefully, more like Russert will ask the hard questions, so we can see that Hillary rage and the country can finally realize the true evil of Hillary.

2007-11-02 14:56:48 · answer #2 · answered by Derail 7 · 3 0

Hillary is beyond any doubt a fraud. She s perceived by millions as a demigod or even a goddess. Actually, she s nothing, just a peanut encased in a false mystique. She s an updated version of Eva Peron, the wife of
Juan Peron who was once president of Argentina. Hillary s appeal closely parallels that of Eva s. The US presidency is no place for a fraud like Hillary.

2015-08-11 10:46:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

Actually, she is a conservative Democrat and came from a family of staunch Republicans. She worked as a "Goldwater Girl" during Barry Goldwater's presidential campaign in 1964. If anything, she is a little too conservative for my tastes but if she gets nominated, I probably will vote for her even though she is not one of my favorites. After nearly eight years of living under an administration that got us mired into an unwinnable war and has run up record deficits, anybody else would be better than what we have right now.

2007-11-02 15:01:24 · answer #4 · answered by RoVale 7 · 2 3

I agree with you, can't stand her, but the stark fact is that Bill won in '92 with 42 or 43 per cent of the popular vote. Watch for a third party candidate ala Ross Perot to come into play and hand it to her.

2007-11-02 14:50:37 · answer #5 · answered by curtisports2 7 · 0 2

Let's hope she doesn't get elected for president. I'm going from Replublican to Independent. I want others to to the same to show that both parties have abandoned the American people. So too shall we.

2007-11-02 16:47:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They said the same things about Nixon in 1968. Be afraid.

2007-11-02 14:45:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

NOPE!!!

2007-11-02 17:37:30 · answer #8 · answered by Carl R 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers