ESPN values loudmouths and imbeciles over trustworthy and likable reporters/personalities.
2007-11-02 14:45:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I hope so!!! Stephen A Smith would be better suited commentating wrestling or something.
I also think Greg Anthony is rude at times. He really needs to be educated on how to have a debate, instead of straight up arguing and being rude. They think they know too much, and try to argue with ex superstars that offer their insight...ex superstars of the game!!! I mean how can you even argue with someone that has been through carrying a team?!?!?!?!?
I appreciate guys like Bill Walton and Jeff Van Gundy (when he commentates) . If you want a quality analysis on basketball without the crap, tune in to these guys. Jalen Rose, Tom Tolbert (to name a few) are good younger guys, that are not rude and loud.
2007-11-02 19:13:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by jay s 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
before everything, If looking at ESPN qualifies as an journey, you have greater beneficial issues to rigidity approximately then Stephen A. 2d in case you have a doctor, could you opt for one which became loud yet instructed you the certainty... You weight as much as a Honda Civic and in case you preserve ingesting 9 cheese burgers an afternoon you will die with bloated cow grease lined fat Albert lips. Or a doctor who stated ahhh if 9 burgers an afternoon works for you pass forward and do it, you're a splash over nicely-known weight yet your in a secure zone... we've prescribed 37 diverse drugs do no longer for get to %. up your prescriptions on your way out. just about each and every reporter on ESPN is variety 2, they inform you precisely what you opt for to pay attention. They take commonplace mainstream opinion and roll with it. His radio instruct have been given canceled as a results of fact americas activities scene has substitute into Cotton candy and his instruct became out of place.
2016-11-10 02:45:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, he is a loudmouth and thinks that he has all the answers. But as long as the stations ratings are up it does not matter whether he's making sense or not.
2007-11-02 14:41:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by hungrykong 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
You mean Screamin A. Smith. He needs to shut up. This is the same idiot who thought if you made a field goal attempt on 3rd down and missed, you get another chance. ESPN should have fired him immediately. Not even cut to commercial, just have a guy come in and tell him to leave. Chuck is awesome by the way.
2007-11-02 21:28:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
You gotta take Chuck over steve....I love it when Charles Barkley is on. More entertaining than when he played..Steven A. Smith as they call him, is just kid of...Wrong...Alot. (with his ideas about basketball)..However, you gotta love the road trip commercial with smith in it.
2007-11-02 15:45:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jake S 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I like Stephen A. Smith, he's very entertaining. Plus, he's there to create controversy. He's definitely better than listening to Charles Barkley repeat himself all night.
2007-11-02 15:31:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by WestCoastin4Life 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
He has an attitude. But, he isn't going anywhere for a long time.
2007-11-05 14:12:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by BasketballFan 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your wrong I love to see Stephen A Smith and he is very brilliant. Now don't be Jealous.
2007-11-02 14:51:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jai 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
He can be quite an idiot at times.
2007-11-02 14:38:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by iknowball 5
·
3⤊
0⤋