Yahoo Answers is like a convention for very convincing transvestites. It's only after you've been here for a while that you realise how many ***** are present.
Let the masses have what they want....as long as they don't interfere with us degenerate individual thinkers. They can replace God with a Walt Disney version of Jesus, buy the DVD, buy the t-shirt, wear the loin cloth, do the puzzle book, watch Rikki, swap wives, buy kittens, eat microwave cordon bleu hobby kits, shop at IKEA, watch holiday TV programmes but go nowhere, swallow the luke warm lies the tabloids spew at us.............and as they crawl towards old age and death they can be safe in the knowledge they were almost certainly meant to be something more than just a damned consumer.
That question is disturbing and it sucks.
Crosswords should be done when waiting to see the doctor after fighting not something worthy of a question and now 500 answers.
2007-11-03 21:36:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Megan Fox. Yes, she's pretty but nothing to get this hype over. Also, the woman has had just about every plastic surgery in the book. Kim Kardashian, she's also pretty, but is taking on an almost surreal, fake look. Also, her most famous *** isn't natural. Other than the main two, most women in Hollywood are overrated on some level. Any average Jane could look like Angelina Jolie if she had the money for it. Photoshop, makeup & surgery go a long way.
2016-05-27 02:49:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well obviously, I've been spending my time in the wrong categories. I never knew I was missing so much sizzle.
2007-11-03 08:45:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Marguerite 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Eh, featured questions get all the glory, while unbrushed gems like this one go unnoticed. It's a cruel world!
2007-11-02 13:28:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I answered it plus gave it a star to just to help add to the list. I hope it keeps going strong, I am curious where it ill end up at. Gave yours a star too, buddy.
I wonder if he is related to: Jim Shorts ? LOL
2007-11-03 02:20:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
darn you for egging me on...you know what I had to do, don't you.
Yes, I reported him for mentioning "tricks". I mean honestly, this is a forum with young impressionable children like Stooge. We cannot be talking about "tricks". I think Will needs to review the TOS.
2007-11-02 13:29:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Yes...I agree...and also...
I find this question to be...
"Demonstrative, wacky, and subversive...authentically in touch with the graceful, dark, and demented side of human nature...ferociously funny and inventive...wide-eyed and wistful...an impossibly effortless question taken to the Nth degree and beyond...
...simply mind-boggling and amazing in all its "bizarro strangeness" and "obfuscation..."
"Touche', my friend...
"Touche'!"
2007-11-03 07:52:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
YAWN! I just don't care what the masses want, its them blasted sheep again bothering the goats.
Get away from me with your trivia puzzles before I wipe my Aaa-rse on the paper.
2007-11-03 07:34:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Did you notice that he has 33 fans and no contacts? Maybe he'll figure out how to solve global warming.
2007-11-02 14:13:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Starr 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
OMG...i still find it very hard to believe...no matter how true it is. We obviously aren't the masses then. So what does that make us all?
2007-11-02 13:44:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dark Dickinsonian 4
·
3⤊
0⤋