2007-11-02 12:06:58 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The chief of the UN AEIEA El Baradei said yesterday there is NO EVIDENCE Iran is building atomic weapons. Weapon grade uranium needs to be 90 percent pure whereas energy-grade uranium only 5 percent.
People who lie never believe what others say because they think they're liars too. Remember Saddam Hussein was telling the truth when he said he had no WMDs and Bush wouldn't believe him. Now he's doing it again with Ahmadinejad.
2007-11-02 12:18:07 · answer #1 · answered by Kamo 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
We had proof that Iraq had WMD
By MATT APUZZO, Associated Press Writer
17 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and some of President Bush's top foreign policy advisers must testify about their conversations with pro-Israel lobbyists, a federal judge ruled Friday in a trial over the misuse of classified information.
ADVERTISEMENT
Two former American Israel Public Affairs Committee lobbyists accused of passing classified information to an Israeli official and the press. They argue, however, that the U.S. regularly uses the pro-Israel group to send back-channel communications to others, and they say Rice can verify that unofficial but sanctioned role.
Lobbyists Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman subpoenaed Rice, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, Deputy National Security Adviser Elliott Abrams and a dozen others to testify.
2007-11-02 12:10:21 · answer #2 · answered by Whitest_American 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Russia building underground nuclear energy facilities.
Saudi Arabia offering Uranium.
The Supreme Leader of Iran wants energy source.
The President is a military man , he is 3rd in line in Iran.
Atomic?
edit: and these folks believe in WMD when it was all PC!
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes
for above if they dare to research :) it
and it is lengthy includes votes for Iraq & Patriot act
then of course all about wmd's...
2007-11-02 12:15:27 · answer #3 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Not according to IAEA, and they do the monitoring, enriching is what has to be done to use for fuel for reactors, unless Uranium Hexafloride is up to like 90% or so it is not bomb material. they have only shown low level enrichment to date
2007-11-02 12:18:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
I think the current plan is to Bomb them with or without our nukes, then find proof.
Isn't that what we did in Iraq... Oh wait,... never mind..
2007-11-02 12:10:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No not yet, but they might have gotton ready made nuke bomb from Russia.
2007-11-02 12:12:17 · answer #6 · answered by Polar Bear 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
There's proof that they have a nuclear program that's suitable for use in developing a weapon.
You won't know for sure they're actually doing it until they set one off, though.
2007-11-02 12:12:29 · answer #7 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Where was proof of Japan planing to attack Perl Harbor?
2007-11-02 12:10:45 · answer #8 · answered by BAKER 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
If the have enriched uranium, that's proof enough.
2007-11-02 12:09:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Don't you watch the O'Reilly Factor?
HOW DARE YOU QUESTION THE FACTOR!
HERETIC!
2007-11-02 12:10:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋