English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-02 10:22:54 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

I don't know why something that is not dangrous should be banned anywhere. The wost thing that could happen is that somone would masturbate. Does that hurt socity in any way?

2007-11-02 10:28:52 · update #1

4 answers

I really don't understand those laws. I mean are they some kind of misguided attempt to curb the moral decline in our country? Shouldn't married couples be free to do whatever they might like in their own bedroom? Are the old farts just jealous that they can no longer sexually perform on a level that would require such accessories? The world may never know.

2007-11-02 10:32:25 · answer #1 · answered by cb_rochelle 1 · 0 0

No.. it's not logical. They are puritanical hypocrites and while they're banning sex toys they're looking for gay sex in minneapolis restrooms.

2007-11-02 17:26:39 · answer #2 · answered by Ellie 2 · 1 0

Republican male politicans were buying up all the
phalic looking devices

2007-11-02 17:26:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

..sure...let's talk when you see your kid floating on a Jenna Jameson doll at the city pool next summer....THEN you'll understand.

2007-11-02 17:37:04 · answer #4 · answered by u_bin_called 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers