Wouldn't it be like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic?
2007-11-02 09:11:29 · 27 answers · asked by Zardoz 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
70% of Americans are against the war.
2007-11-02 09:14:57 · update #1
time_wounds_all_heelz - We know there will be no change if a Republican is elected. There's a posibility with a Democrat.
2007-11-02 09:18:28 · update #2
Infidel - I think this is the first time we have agreed on something.
2007-11-02 09:27:12 · update #3
I think we need to elect an Independent.
The two party system has failed for over 20 years!
2007-11-02 09:25:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We have wars and rumors of wars and you guys aren't listening. You need a President who can fight wars because whether you want to be in them or not, you will be or they'll change the America that you know. Freedom is at risk and I say give me liberty or give me death. Have you heard that before? That means war.
The same folks who wanted Americans and Jews dead in World War II are the same folks who want them dead today.
The Muslims fought with Hitler.
While rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic the officer yelled "woman, children and unbelievers go first." That's correct the unsaved were asked to board the life boats because the Christians knew if they died they would end up in hell so they gave their life for the unbelievers, because they were looking forward to heaven. No greater love has any man than he lay down his life for his friend. The Motion Picture Industry didn't broadcast this, but those who were last to leave the Titanic heard this from the officer in charge of the remaining life boats.
Make sure you have a Christian President, because without one you can set this nation back 400 years.
2007-11-02 09:40:02 · answer #2 · answered by Jeancommunicates 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if you count change for the worse, then yes, things will change!
I absolutely believe that should another Retardican be elected, the war in the middle east will expand to other countries, and the threat of nuclear holocaust will increase dramatically, more of our civil rights will be curtailed or taken away entirely, the supreme court will be packed with ideologues to ensure the police state for years to come, all of our allies around the world will abandon us, the value of the dollar will become a joke, oil prices will continue to soar ($200 a barrel is not out of the question), China will continue to own more and more of our Nation, not only by buying up our corporations and land, but also buying our increasing debt while we ship more and more jobs over there.
AND, I also believe those things will happen if Hillary is elected.
Can't someone save us from ourselves?!
2007-11-02 09:23:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are absolutely correct on 7 of the 8 republican candidates. On them there would be no agenda change that is substantive. There is one, however, that would be different. that is Ron Paul. He is the ONLY candidate (Republican or Democrat) who actually voted against the war back before the Iraq invasion. His reasoning for not going to war (when the pressure was so great at that time) is brilliant. Watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aewpvcxAwTk
2007-11-02 09:23:37 · answer #4 · answered by Bloatedtoad 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Republicans are polling worse than a Republican in congress.
Vegas is offering $1000-1 that a Republican will not even win a dog catcher position in 2008.
2007-11-02 09:29:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm a Democrat, however if there should be a Republican candidate like Eisenhower or Truman....
true statesman that posess integrity, intelligence, honesty & a conscience,I would vote for them in a heartbeat.
They. at least knew how to find the constitution.
2007-11-02 09:22:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i do no longer understand what is going to ensue yet many contained in something of the worldwide are hopeing Obamma will substitute lots of issues if he wins. the reality that issues are so undesirable is a robust examine in a confusing way. it particularly is barely while human beings start to break that they substitute into prepared to take heed to concerning to the complication we are all in with the aid of fact of capitolism and greed. Our earth has many issues. perhaps we can help strengthen issues if we are sparkling on what they're. The substitute desires to be interior the path of sustainablity. lowering greenhouse emmissions, addressing climate. substitute as there's a state of war against us all. An emergency! an exceedingly grave emergency, dashing with the aid of human intake. that is sturdy your trucks interior the driveway, I surely have the comparable subject with my VAN besides the fact that that is on autogas. Janet
2016-12-08 10:08:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is dependant on something not so obvious to the average lib.
If the next President is a conservative, not a Lib in sheeps clothing like the current President...we can have change while keeping government sane and responcible.
2007-11-02 09:22:03 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That and a Captain that prefers to stay the course not ram ahead full throttle .... (Titanic humor... )
Edit: Contiv Bravo!
http://news.independent.co.UK/world/americas/article3075691.ece
Military contracts going from Republicans to Obama & now Hill
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/25/clinton-defends-her-lobbyist-money/
2007-11-02 09:16:06 · answer #9 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
As opposed to a democrat who would place all the chairs inside the Titanic. But hey what you can't see can't hurt you right?
2007-11-02 09:19:00 · answer #10 · answered by rz1971 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
"This administration isn't sinking. It's soaring. If anything, they're rearranging the deck chairs on the Hindenburg."
2007-11-02 10:13:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋