2007-11-02 07:26:48 · 22 answers · asked by Sporty 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes, I would if her objectives and agendas were in line with what I believed.
2007-11-02 07:30:04 · answer #1 · answered by Workcompguru31 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely I would... but she has to be qualified and not playing the gender card... unlike hilary!
I'm sure someday there will be a qualified woman but in todays race there are none...
But if you are asking if i would vote for a woman just to get a woman in office? NO WAY.. and that seems to be what is happening here... Find a qualified woman then ask me the same question.
Ya know.. if by some chance Hilary does get elected, i think she will only ruin the chances for any other woman ever to be trusted again.. I think this womans stand to elect a woman will be much harder in the future if Hilary gets the chance to be the first.. People will be set back years and the chances of seeing that happen again will take years and years to recover from... Women be patient cuz by you just voting for her cuz she's a woman will be the biggest set back you have ever expierenced.
Too many people aren't listening to her.. actually listen to her as you would a man and make your choice from that.. She's pathetic.
2007-11-02 14:43:54 · answer #2 · answered by Ditka 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yep. A QUALIFIED one, but not "just because" the candidate is a woman.
I once worked for a company that promoted a woman to President and she was aweful. She proved an unqualified woman could do just as weak of a job as an unqualified man.
Show me qualifications and let me hear your unwavering positions, ideas, vision (not visions) and agenda. Then I will make up my mind if I identify with you or not. That woman lost her job and it set women back 10 years at that company. She is over HR now but she was TERRIBLE!!!!
2007-11-02 14:40:52 · answer #3 · answered by USA 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but not Hillary Clinton or a woman president that uses her gender as a point to be elected.
There are women who are good leaders. We just don't have one running for president at the moment.
2007-11-03 10:29:41 · answer #4 · answered by tigertiger000 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would vote for a female President. But not just because she is a female. She needs to be qualified and be a strong leader. She should also be wise and be strong in character. Now these are qualities that Clinton does not have, so I can not vote for that one if her name is on a ballot.
2007-11-02 14:33:13 · answer #5 · answered by Johnny P 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Looks like you are a male chauvinist.Would you care to explain why one shouldn't vote for a
presidential candidate who is a female?
2007-11-02 14:48:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Condelessa Rice for national fluffer!
2007-11-03 03:32:57 · answer #7 · answered by Michael S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes depending on her qualifications for office (which I would use also to judge a male candidate for office.
2007-11-02 14:30:14 · answer #8 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes. In fact, barring a miracle (such as Edwards becoming a lot tougher than he's been), I will: Hillary Clinton.
2007-11-02 14:40:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I vote for whoever is the bestr candidate running.
Male of female doesn't matter to me.
Hilliary is not on my list of people I can vote for in good conscience, however.
Also, FYI, "Female" doesn't have a hyphen.
2007-11-02 14:38:46 · answer #10 · answered by Darkwolf 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋