2007-11-02 07:13:28 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I dont think so it would almost be comparable to trying a child, since the person has no recollection whatsoever they should not be punished. But then the question becomes...if there is damage to person, place, or thing...who is then responsible? Their parents? lol
I really like this question Dan!
2007-11-02 17:23:33 · answer #1 · answered by they call me ma 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Temporary insanity or something I am sure. Depending on what the crime was you would be required to tke some sort of therapy, and maybe some community service.
2007-11-02 14:17:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What crime?
Because I ate all the ice cream?
No I shouldn't be punished.
2007-11-02 14:16:38 · answer #3 · answered by zul 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I don't think it's really feasible to commit one. I sleep walk and wake up when I do something really odd!
2007-11-02 14:16:02 · answer #4 · answered by evasive_eyes 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
theres a section in some law book and id lie if i say i know the name of the book, but it reads:
"ignorance is no excuse to break the law"
2007-11-02 14:16:18 · answer #5 · answered by matt t 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes ,its like when crazy people committed crime
2007-11-02 14:16:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, just as you can get totally s*** faced and go do a bunch of stuff and not remember doing any of it
2007-11-02 14:23:46 · answer #7 · answered by Par 4 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i dont think so. as long as you could prove you were sleep walking and not just using that as a cover story.
2007-11-02 14:16:50 · answer #8 · answered by *I Need More Cowbell* 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that wouldn't be the problem though, the problem would be proving that the person was sleep walking. otherwise, everyone would use that defense
2007-11-02 14:16:26 · answer #9 · answered by kMaz 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think a person should be punished for that.
2007-11-02 14:16:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋