While im not against teaching kids to help out our fellow man in need.. I am against the goverment saying you eat enough, I want half your pizza.. We are promoting a dependent society that is for sure.. This was once the land of opportunity where hard work meant success was your reward... Now success is punished.. go figure
2007-11-02 06:42:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Antiliber 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
No, you clearly don't know what socialism is or are deliberately trying to twist the truth. Like most of the regressive right who warn about the dangers of socialism you seem to advocate social Darwinism.
Social Darwinism, term coined in the late 19th century to describe the idea that humans, like animals and plants, compete in a struggle for existence in which natural selection results in “survival of the fittest.” Social Darwinists base their beliefs on theories of evolution developed by British naturalist Charles Darwin. Some social Darwinists argue that governments should not interfere with human competition by attempting to regulate the economy or cure social ills such as poverty. Instead, they advocate a laissez-faire political and economic system that favors competition and self-interest in social and business affairs. Social Darwinists typically deny that they advocate a “law of the jungle.” But most propose arguments that justify imbalances of power between individuals, races, and nations because they consider some people more fit to survive than others.
http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/RefArticle.aspx?refid=761579584
We're humans, all of us even the lazy. If you have a pizza and someone else would die because they lack food the only moral option is to share. If you're against that you are a social Darwinist, a theory that appealed to great leaders such as Hitler and Mussolini.
No Democrat is proposing Nationalizing Industries or the means of production so they are NOT socialists. The American right needs to stop lying and admit their own agenda that isn't capitalistic but pure Social Darwinism AKA jungle capitalism.
2007-11-03 02:26:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's the misleading stuff the dems use to try an corrupt young minds.
They were starting to do it to my kid at his school, but I managed to cure him of liberalism.
He’d been spouting a bunch of socialistic crap his teachers at school are pouring down his throat. Up until my wife died 2 years ago, we were home schooling him and his 13 yr old brother – but for the past 2 years I’ve had to put them in public education.
Thus the older boy was spouting the typical liberal garbage his government lackey teachers have been spouting. You know the drill – the capitalistic system isn’t fair to everyone, people need a minimum amount of support from the government, from each according to his ability , to each according to his need. Blah , blah blah.
Anyway I told my son if he worked with me on Saturday, pouring a 10 yard concrete driveway, I’d pay him $100. I told his younger brother he could go play with his friends and go to the movies.
Anyway I had my older kid busting his *ss, raking that concrete, screeding, tamping, floating and trowelling. Must have been 95 degrees. By the time it was broomed off, he looked like a whipped puppy.
So I get him home and give him 10 $10 bills. Then I tell him – you have to give $60 to your brother (the one who played and went to the movies).
He started complaining – I turned his **** right back on him – his brother needed the money – it wasn’t fair that his brother had less than him – blah blah blah.
I told him when you consider marginal income tax rates, sales tax, property taxes etc etc – keeping $40 out of every $100 you earn was about what he could expect. And I held to my guns – he got $40 and the lazy kid got $60.
Somehow I think the kid’s gonna wind up a conservative Republican.
2007-11-02 06:42:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by flaming_liberal415 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
i see many of the ailments of society caused by poverty. Poverty i might classify as an unfair distribution of money and power. If a person feels powerless, they are likely to abuse drugs, steal, hurt others etc. We as a society want a certain level of safety from dangers. The issues that cause poverty are related to the pecking orders that are set up for a few to succeed. This means that by very nature of a competitive society, only a few will succeed or be frontrunners in power and money. The only way that they can win is to have everyone agree to compete. This collective agreement should come on the condition that if we achieve power and success over others we must repay the society for that chance to achieve. I believe we should repay the society by helping the poor, which makes the entire country safer and happier..
less drugs,,, less crime...
2007-11-02 06:41:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
confident, in simple terms as quickly as you provide up beating your spouse. Your question makes various assumptions that are no longer genuinely supported by using information. i'm a Democrat. i'm no longer a socialist. I artwork in unfastened business enterprise. i used to be a instructor, and we reported the pledge daily first factor in the morning. i think of government has a functionality, and that if unfastened business enterprise could genuinely police itself, we would desire fewer regulations and much less enforcement attempt on those regulations. besides the undeniable fact that, I stay in a international the place human beings make each attempt to benefit from a topic by using pushing the actual expenses of that subject onto somebody else. "Recycling" consists of recommendations. There are those human beings that fee to recycle electronics while what they actually do is deliver the electronics off to a minimum of one/3 international countries the place the plastic is burned away and the metals are retrieved. it fairly is grimy tothe area of being poisonous, yet as long as they are in a place to smash out with it and declare that that they are "helping the atmosphere by using preserving electronics out of the landfills," and make a earnings doing so, they're going to. while somebody tries to describe to me how i think of by using comparing me to Hitler, i assume they have defective reasoning, and fairly a lot stop listening. Did you examine this placed up when I suggested you nonetheless beat your spouse?
2016-10-03 04:42:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Erika 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get rich quick schemes in the capitalist business world, (buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the stock market), do not actually work. Remaining solvent does not actually exist within false economics capitalism.
Profit existing in the capitalist business world, or millionaires existing within capitalism, is pathological deception committed by the 21 organizations spying on the population with plain clothes agents, (with covert fake names and fake backgrounds).
Actual economics is the persons paying the monthly business loan payments of companies voting at work in order to control the property they are paying for.
Capitalism is the psychology of imaginary parents, false economics, and the criminal deception of employees that are paying the bills (including the stocks and bonds, or shares) of companies.
Anti-democracy republicanism is the psychology of imaginary parents, and false government.
2007-11-03 00:25:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yeah it's communism alright glad to hear the left is starting to self destruct.
To answer one if that is true if Hillary loses The Bushes & the Clintons will be out of the white house.
2007-11-02 06:36:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
the plain and simple facts are demonstrated by Warren Buffets Challenge
Warren Buffet the 3rd Richest person on earth A DEMOCRAT
challenged his fellow billionaires and millionaires this
he would give them $1,000,000 cash if they could proove that they pay more taxes (% wise) on thier income than thier secretarys !!!
SO FAR NO ONE HAS PROVEN THEY DO
WARREN BUFFET SAYS HE PAYS LESS THAN ALL THE PEOPLE IN HIS OFFICE (% WISE)
hE THINKS HE GETS UNFAIR TAX BREAKS
as do all of the wealthiest in America
so go ahead
EAT YOUR PIZZA BY YOURSELF-------stingy
2007-11-02 06:39:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
What's even worse is that not only are we forced to give them a slice, we're forced to provide them a slice of their liking, even if it costs more than the original slice.
2007-11-02 06:41:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gus K 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
hey sounds like the US policy toward Israel
2007-11-02 06:39:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋