i know it's personal but who cares just answer the damn question.
2007-11-02 06:28:19 · 16 answers · asked by Esa Chica 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
The current top tier democratic candidates just dance around the issue of Iraq and continue to play the blame game. Neither Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama has a proper exit strategy outlined for Iraq.. And in a prior debate we learned that they could not promise to have the troops out by 2013, possibly later.. Not too mention they both support full amnesty for illegals and both voted for the Patriot Act, which is a direct infringement on our privacy.... I don't support either one of them, but if I had to pick I'd say Hillary..
Why?
Obama's voting record conflicts with what he advocates..
-Military action in Pakistan if we have actionable intel. (Aug 2007)
-Fact Check: Yes, Obama said invade Pakistan to get al Qaeda. (Aug 2007)
-Extend welfare and Medicaid to immigrants. (Jul 1998)
-Voted NO on declaring English as the official language of the US government. (Jun 2007)
-Voted YES on establishing a Guest Worker program. (May 2006)
-Voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security. (May 2006)
-Register women for draft, but not for combat. (Jul 2007)
-Voted YES on preserving habeus corpus for Guantanamo detainees.
-Voted YES on reauthorizing the PATRIOT Act. (Mar 2006)
-Opposes gay marriage; supports civil union & gay equality. (Oct 2006)
-Supports affirmative action in colleges and government. (Jul 1998)
-Explore nuclear power as part of alternative energy mix. (Jul 2007)
2007-11-02 06:45:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
All these people saying Obama, are phonies. Obama against a republican is not going to win. it may be a squeaker, but that doesn't matter. Just hand it again to the republicans if that's what you want. Hilary is the only one who will be tough enough to get us a democratic president. We need to quit farting around and get serious about beating the republicans. I would like Juan Valdez for president before I would vote for a republican. They are running this country into the ground and out to sea.Forget about all this flip-flop garbage and where they stand on illegal aliens, etc. The republicans tap dance all over our heads and laugh while doing it and we say thank you for scaring us sh238less and lowering our expectation to did anything in the US blow up today? If not we don't care about anything else.
2007-11-02 08:22:51 · answer #2 · answered by Steve C 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama! because i imagine that's thoroughly pathetic that human beings imagine that in easy words 2 households are able to operating our united states for obtainable about 3 many years. it changed into Bush, Clinton, Bush, now likely Clinton back. it is not any longer replace. we choose replace. no longer in easy words that, yet just about none of the different international places contained in the international like Bush. they did not like Clinton an excellent purchase more advantageous. i imagine that Hillary would added alienate our allies. for my area, i love Ron Paul the superb, and that i'd pick to ensure him win. he has some unconventional techniques about improving our united states that i imagine will be very effective. yet i'm no longer ignorant to the way that the election procedure works. a democrat is going to win the superb election. and that's unnecessary to vote for someone who receives an exceptionally, very small percentage of the votes. so, i have self assurance that you would possibly want to %. the "lesser of two evils" if Obama or Clinton aren't to any extent further your first selection, to ascertain that your vote to point something in any respect. so i pick Obama, in accordance to each and every of the assistance I really have about both significant democratic applicants.
2016-10-23 06:45:56 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary NO WAY... Obama not a chance... Edwards is heads above both with his political views and he is honest about them whether we like it or not.. I don't like his tax views, but atleast he pulls no strings and says yes they will increase unlike every other politician who says they are going to lower them until they get elected and proceeds to doubling them.
Gas before bush's 1st term was 1.67 a gal and didn't he promise to keep the price down? Geez it only tripled in 7 years.. great job bush..
2007-11-02 07:12:46 · answer #4 · answered by Ditka 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, it's gotta be Obama, fer shure - I mean, really, with Queen Hillary the Great so far ahead in the Not Even Remotely Qualified Sweepstakes, it's gotta be Obama, fer shure.
2007-11-02 06:34:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Obama. The idea of Hilary president scares me.
2007-11-02 06:31:59 · answer #6 · answered by Emzie 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Obama for sure, Hillary would not only screw up this country but the entire world! EEK! Vote for Obama!
2007-11-02 06:38:01 · answer #7 · answered by dGom 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
obama and not because i'm black but because hilary is a woman and she will not be respected or taken serious by our biggest rivals in the middle east if this was 15 years ago maybe, but right now OBAMA.
2007-11-02 06:32:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neither. That's like asking If I want Evian or Fiji bottled water.
2007-11-02 07:43:29 · answer #9 · answered by Darkwolf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama, because Hillary has promised to violate the bill of rights, (see source), she's supporting giving illegal aliens drivers licenses, she is a socialist....
What more do you need?
2007-11-02 07:04:56 · answer #10 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋