Why does the majority of the American public believe so strongly in the FDA and FCC?

Question

The FDA readily approves knowingly harmfull drugs routinly, then only pulls them off the market when the body counts are to embarassing to ignore? Why does the FCC fight against any critics of the wireless industry and the extrememly damaging effects of EMF radiation that is killing our nation and making us sick? Answer>>> Greed, money, good lobbying!

Answer 1

The same reason the American public believes in their media...most people figure that as long as things work for them then everything is ok. The FDA is basically a revolving door for drug companies now if you think about how little they do to protect us from dangerous food additives...and how much they do to get a drug APPROVED. If you look at the case of MSG..after the plaintiffs had proven to the judge all existing studies showing it wasnt harmful had flaws I believe they used the Freedom of Information Act or something to try to get the FDA to say what information it had to prove it wasnt harmful. The FDA REFUSED to do this..and the judge cited that since the FDA is a "food expert" if they say MSG is not harmful they dont need to show evidence to support their opinion because they are an expert in the situation.

Oh yea...lets not forget the CIA is the worlds largest drug cartel and the reason drugs are illegal because it jacks the prices up and gives them money for their terrorist activities and sponsorship to terrorist groups. Nevermind the violence it causes in our cities...or the fact that countries like Afghanistan and Colombia have no legitimate venue for their products. As long as U.S foreign policy agenda is being carried out for the empire..that's all that matters...how many of you knew that in the 90's the U.S tried to build an oil pipeline through Afghanistan? Or that the U.S attacked Saddam because he was trying to exclude us as an oil trading partner and sell his oil in euros? Or what about that Iran wants to do the same thing? If any other country in the world had as much debt as us they'd be bankrupt(Zimbabwe) but because of world demand for oil...and all oil being traded in dollars....it keeps demand for the dollar strong so we have an unlimited supply of debt...interesting huh?

Answer 2

Well I believe the FDA has issues but the FCC on the other hand persons that have not looked into the whole EMF issue will see that EMF doesn't cause damaging effects, there have been NO studies by anyone that proves this without a doubt. it is all hearsay. The FDA needs to pull its' head out and stop taking kickbacks from the drug companies that pay lobbyists to get their stuff approved, The FCC on the other hand has a watchdog group called the ARRL who is privately funded and keeps them in check and does a good job.

Answer 3

I'm not sure what the issues are with the FDA and the FCC. I support their missions but since I have interacted with the FDA, I see some problems. But I don't know how they can be fixed. They are needed, absolutely. It could be funding issues. Oftentimes, government agencies are not given enough money to do what they need to do or maybe they do not have enough power. I believe that most of the people in these agencies are there to protect people in one way or another. However, the whistleblowing issue needs to be strengthened because there are not enough protections for whistleblowers. We need to start protesting in the millions because these folks put it all on the line for us and we need to support them. That's how you get government to work. We stand strong and together. It's worth it, isn't it?

Answer 4

Three words. Tin foil hat.

The FDC does not approve dangerous drugs. They only approve helpful drugs. How many Americans use drugs today to stay healthy? Most. The life span of the US is higher due to these miracle drugs.

EMF making us sick? Do research. It's been proven to be false. Many times over.

Answer 5

"complicated paintings unions aren't to any extent further precisely standard, in spite of the indisputable fact that: a nil.33 of those surveyed seen them favorably, a quarter seen them unfavorably, and something else reported they were both uncertain or had no longer heard adequate about them" (para 2) a nil.33 isn't 2 cases a fourth. perhaps you should word issues otherwise, like say that both:a million ratio is for those adversarial to weakening their bargaining rights really than declaring they back the unions.

Answer 6

You answered your own question. I agree.