English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't understand! Why would you have to force someone to goto Iraq?!


What a bunch of freedom hating P-U-S-S-I-E-S!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21495386/




USA USA USA USA!

2007-11-02 06:08:34 · 10 answers · asked by ExDopefiend 2 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

Since they work for the State Department and receive a check from us the tax payer they should have to go where we need them. If they don't want to then they can always quit. Nobody is being forced to go to Iraq they have the option of terminating their service any time they choose.

2007-11-02 06:16:21 · answer #1 · answered by Mother 6 · 0 1

I'm trying to understand this question. Do you know what's the meaning of freedom?

A is forcing B to do something. You say that B is a freedom hating pussycat. A is forcing B to do something. A is forcing B to do something.
Did you mean that A is a freedom hating pussycat?
Because that would make a lot more sense.

In case you don't get it. Forcing someone to do anything, even if you truly believe that it's going to be fundamental for freedom, is AGAINST freedom.
If you can't choose there's no freedom. If you have to FORCE someone to do anything you're taking the choices from him and doing them yourself. That's AGAINST freedom, that's what a freedom hater do, that's what Saddam used to do.
Next thing, you'll ask for the draft. Taking people at gun point and sending them either to jail or to the middle east... to fight for freedom...

2007-11-02 06:44:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It could be because diplomats’ work for the State Department and it was the State Department that paved the road to Iraq in the first place.

2007-11-02 06:15:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Duncan Hunter sent a letter to the president today saying he should send a state department recruiting team to Walter Reed and Bethesda medical facilities and offer the jobs to the wounded soldiers. they are in need of jobs and are willing to go back. Fire anyone that is not willing to do what is ask of them in the state department (like EVERY OTHER JOB) and give the brave men and women who have given to this country a start to their future.

2007-11-02 06:16:55 · answer #4 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 0 1

Because diplomats are forcing the State Department to give them paychecks.

2007-11-02 06:12:57 · answer #5 · answered by Rationality Personified 5 · 5 0

Because no one wants to be in Iraq . So they must force people to go .

2007-11-02 06:13:11 · answer #6 · answered by TroubleMaker 5 · 5 0

The average person doesn't want to sacrifice his or her life for absolutely nothing.

Why can't cons understand that?

2007-11-02 06:21:05 · answer #7 · answered by ck4829 7 · 1 1

because they insist on sending peoples chidren over there when they don't even want to go themselves even if their only job is stamping and signing documents,pretty cowardly if u ask me.its not like they're doging bullets and shrapnel

2007-11-02 06:13:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

So if your employer told you to jump into a flaming pile of sh1t would you? After all they pay you.

2007-11-02 06:22:21 · answer #9 · answered by gone 7 · 0 1

I can not believe how disgusting state depatment employees are.

If 160,000 troops can be there what is their problem?

2007-11-02 06:17:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers