English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
4

do i need one to play a console?

2007-11-02 05:59:53 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

i need a tv to play the console but i dont watch tv on it cos it has no signal, do i need a tv lisence?

2007-11-02 06:09:08 · update #1

8 answers

"You need a TV Licence to use any television receiving equipment such as a TV set, set-top boxes, video or DVD recorders, computers or mobile phones to watch or record TV programmes as they are being shown on TV.

If you use a set-top box with a hi-fi system or another device that can only be used to produce sounds and can't display TV programmes, and you don't install or use any other TV receiving equipment, you don't need a TV Licence."

Basically the licence is to WATCH/RECORD TV - not to OWN a TV.

2007-11-02 06:11:21 · answer #1 · answered by Mordent 7 · 3 0

No but once you have a TV then you must have one. If the console can receive TV then you need a licence even if you do not watch the TV.

2007-11-02 06:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by ANF 7 · 0 0

You only need a tv licence if you have a tv ariel plugged into a tv that is tuned in to receive any tv channells

2007-11-03 06:02:22 · answer #3 · answered by stormydays 5 · 0 0

No you don't need to have another licence for each tv you have in the house - you just need one tv licence for the one that it's tuned to receive programmes.

2007-11-02 06:48:37 · answer #4 · answered by Medusa 3 · 0 0

You use a TV to play your consol, thefore you need a licence, you have equipment that is able to recieve TV brodcasts weather you use it for that purpose or not

2007-11-04 22:20:36 · answer #5 · answered by alan v 4 · 0 0

If you have equipment that can receive TV signal you need licence whether you watch or not.

2007-11-02 08:34:43 · answer #6 · answered by Fred3663 7 · 0 0

i artwork for the biggest commercial broadcasting enterprise in the united kingdom - wager who??!!! From a enterprise attitude, i'm happy the BBC do no longer promote because of the fact it would right now 0.5 my employers advertising gross sales, and that i might in all probability be out of a job. As a viewer regardless of the undeniable fact that, and as my own opinion, I thoroughly disagree with the point of television 'Tax'. There are some very solid arguments for it, because of the fact the BBC does positioned out some wonderful programmes. the enormous characteristic wildlife sequence with David Attenborough etc does no longer be made, because of the fact they fee lots, it would possibly never be commercially doable (you will possibly never get better the fee of coming up it). yet extremely, the BBC pumps out some genuine cr@p and does not justify the outrageous volume we are charged to disguise their costs. i might recommend that a decreased licence fee may be charged, per risk a ordinary £20 per year to disguise needed declares from the government (extreme climate warnings etc). Even then, the government can and do command whilst needed all broadcast indicators whilst that's needed to tell the ordinary public of a few thing they deem important. they'll in all probability tax workstation's quickly regardless of the undeniable fact that it somewhat is unwarranted aswell, until all workstation's contain television enjoying cards geared up as ordinary.

2016-12-30 14:51:02 · answer #7 · answered by rusher 4 · 0 0

No. But if you have a tv you need one.

2007-11-02 06:03:52 · answer #8 · answered by angel 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers