TH M-Moore 9-11 film was totally baseless but everyone who had his leanings flocked to it.
an The Incoventiant Truth is being watch in the UK basically to show people in the UK whaty Communist Propanganda it is and there are errors in the film that have inconentantly found out.
Should the film be called I suckered you liberal for money based on logical fallicies?
2007-11-02 05:59:43 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ok I'll clean up the typing I was just laughing to hard when I typed this:
The M-Moore 9-11 film was totally baseless but everyone who had his leanings flocked to it.
an The Inconvenient Truth is being watch in the UK basically to show people in the UK what Communist Propaganda it is and there are errors in the film that have Inconveniently found out.
Should the film be called I suckered you liberal for money based on logical fallacies?
2007-11-02 06:08:42 · update #1
No, but it is becoming clear that conservative shrillness has only the capacity to pronounce themselves logical at the top of their lungs while having no capacity to actually argue logically.
Fahrenheit 9/11 was a filmmakers point of view. It is probably one of Moore's weaker efforts, but the key points in the film have been born out over and over.
"An inconvenient truth" is routinely vilified by those that do not believe or trust in science which is overwhelmingly in agreement with the message of the film. It's absolutely amazing how anyone can accept the science that makes life easy for them or supports their political views, but reject the same rigorously arrived at conclusions when the don't. How convenient. (Yes, man made green house gasses do cause global warming. Yes condoms prevent disease and unwanted pregnancy, thereby reducing AIDS and abortions. Yes, evolution is real). Only in the conservative world is it better to drive a 6000 pound $40,000 SUV that gets 12 mpg in a $3.00/gallon world than a $23,000 Prius that gets 50mpg, because saving $17,000 in price and dropping your fuel bill by 75% might help the environment.
2007-11-02 06:43:02 · answer #1 · answered by jehen 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Leader.
2016-05-27 01:29:07 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't pay a penny to see The Inconvenient Truth. It was shown at churches and in auditoriums by environmental groups for free. What part of promoting development of new green technology is Communist Propanganda?
2007-11-02 06:09:24 · answer #3 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
liberal leaders will do whatever they have to, to get followers and make money off of them. i don't understand why they believe that they are the majority and everyone thinks like them either, because thats a load of crap, anyone with a brain can see through them.
2007-11-02 14:36:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you just realize that.
Next time We tell you about Eisenhower's Military Industrial Complex speech, pay more attention
2007-11-02 06:05:30 · answer #5 · answered by whirling W dervish 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, but the rest of the world agrees with Moore and Al Gore and the rest of the world including the majority of American people, disagrees with you. Bush suckered the entire country and it is obvious that you are still being suckered by him while the rest of the country has already written him off as the worst president in our country's history.
2007-11-02 06:04:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
two words: GLOBAL WARMING....how is this all of a sudden a "global emergency"???? guess it takes money to fuel a gulfstream G5 jet, huh Al Gore?
2007-11-02 14:40:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mike Moore is a dead beat loser ,
As far as our fearless leaders ...it is not Democrats , Nor is it Republicans ,
Leaders taking advantage of those they serve is everywhere on both sides , it is called biting the hand that feeds ....using those followers of you for personal gain that is just politics ......
it ain't a democrat thang , it ain't no republican thang .........
it is a politician thang , we are not supposed to understand ..
2007-11-02 06:08:38 · answer #8 · answered by Insensitively Honest 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Are you implying that Michael Moore is a politician? He's not. He's simply a citizen who is informing the public of things the government won't share.
You have the right to disagree with him. But others have the right to agree with him. We're not suckered, just enlightened.
2007-11-02 06:04:52 · answer #9 · answered by katydid 7 · 8⤊ 5⤋
Nope.
2007-11-02 06:06:57 · answer #10 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋