2007-11-02 04:40:09 · 21 answers · asked by Spartacus 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nope.
*you're welcome :)*
2007-11-02 04:57:16 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He is telling a PORTION of the truth, which is not the whole truth. Did he do this on purpose to push his own agenda? If so, then wouldn't telling only a portion of the truth to support your views the same as lying? Either way he got an Oscar and a Nobel Prize, so at this point it doesn't really matter. Looks like he got what he wanted.
As for "Global Warming"........scients say our planet is approximately 4 billion years old. In that time we have experienced multiple ice ages, several mass extinctions, and at one point all the continents were massed together as one huge desert with average temperatures over 125 degrees. So I find it hard to believe that the global temperature rising a degree or two over a 50 year cycle is due more to mankind, and not natural cycles in the earth's climate. Cleaning up after ourselves is NEVER a bad idea, but I find it hard to believe that mankind is causing "global warming". Not when the California wildfires released 8 tons of "global warming" gasses into the atmosphere, and not when the erruption of Mt. Pinnatubo in 1991 lowered the global temperature by half a degree in the year following it's erruption.
2007-11-02 04:47:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Al Gore is simply saying what the scientists are telling him.
To call Al Gore a liar is to call thousands of climate scientists liars too.
You can call Al Gore a hyporcrite or whatever you want, but he's got the basic facts about global warming right.
2007-11-02 05:13:03 · answer #3 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
all the suitable lies comprise an factor of reality - there's a valid medical debate to verify the end results of human interest on climate. yet' an inconvenient reality' is organic propaganda designed to magnify the effects and to sell the Globalist "answer" which incorporates carbon tax which will smash the middle type business enterprise of the western international and to construct up public help for "eugenics" which in this context is the culling of billions of the international inhabitants. This replaced into first promoted by using the "club of Rome" in the 1968 funded by using the Rothschilds and chaired by using David Rockefeller which replaced into the start of the well-liked "environmental" flow. Henry Kissinger promoted the suggestions of inhabitants help in 1974, utilizing famines, disease and conflict. Kissinger to at present time is a go-between betwen each US President and the Rothschilds and different Luciferians of the secret government who're in the back of them. Gore is definitely one of their stooges too. BTW the Rothschilds additionally are in the back of the CFR .
2016-10-03 04:31:21 · answer #4 · answered by larusch 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes to some extent...he likes to stretch alot of some of these half truths and like to make the worst case scenario on alot of his conclusions.....
I'd like anyone in the world to show me without any doubt the actual % of human activity causing global warming....
I especially liked in the Inconvenient Truth were Gore talks about his life growing up on a tobacco farm in tennessee or how he was robbed of the presidency to bush..glad to see he wasnt using the movie for aiding his political agenda...thought the movie was solely about the environment? You mean he lied to us?????!!!! gasp!!!!!
2007-11-02 05:29:00 · answer #5 · answered by Dan Da Man 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore is incapable of telling the truth.
Global warming is happening, but not because of our puny human race.
It's a natural cycle that we can't do a damn thing about anyway.
Sit back, enjoy the mild winters and buy some beach front property in Southern Georgia.
.
2007-11-02 05:00:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I should think he jumped into this thing because he wants to look like the Green Messiah, saving the Earth so we all can use the internet He invented!
With the Academy award and the nobel prize in hand, the rest of the world might just make him Secretary General of the UN, so to heck with the messly President job!
2007-11-02 05:03:38 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Probably not, but global warming is gonna happen no matter what we do, we speed the process up,eveyone knows that,but when you consider the changes the planet has been through since it's birth well there is no stoping this no matter what we do,
2007-11-02 04:47:54 · answer #8 · answered by Roland 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What politician ever did tell the truth? Al is not a scientist or an actor but he he is regarded and awarded as both. Al will not debate any opposing scientist and constantly claims there is no debate over global warming. His GW claims have the word "consensus" which means agreement, and this is not science. Science is the ability to prove an outcome, over and over again, and there can be no consensus in science. I have read many scientific studys on GW and the main fact to remember is CO2 is not causing GW, it is a result of GW. Global Warming is a natural occurence, and will happen weather we change our light bulbs or not. Mankind has no affect positive or negative on GW.
2007-11-02 04:42:27 · answer #9 · answered by Curtis 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
For the most part, yes he is being truthful. Yes global warming is a natural occurrence, bu that's not the issue. The Question is are humans contributing to it? The answer is yes we are.
2007-11-02 04:45:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I guess those glaciers are melting off because of global cooling? There is no doubt about global warming. The doubt begins with what is causing it!
2007-11-02 04:47:45 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋