Since she can't see the opinion dials of the focus groups, she doesn't know how her answers are floating with the audience, which is why she can't hold a position. She has to try to please everyone, and so she flip flops all over the place. Anyone who can't see that after the last debate needs to open their eyes.
2007-11-02 04:36:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Leah 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is also the same candidate that still goes around talking about programs that will self-admittedly never get passed in an effort to buy votes.
She's no worse nor better than Bush. And everyone is right, she's a politician, not a leader.
The President has to be a leader, not a beauracrat. And why is anyone comparing any candidate to Bush? Is being better than him really the only major qualifier for you people? Great, in that case our next pres just wont suck as bad.....
Smart people....really smart.
2007-11-02 04:43:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Phil M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No she will never be truthful until she is elected. She wants to say everything that people want to hear instead of saying what she really thinks about an issue. I think that in the long run this will get her into trouble. Look at how the Republicans picked apart Kerry for waffling on Iraq. Clinton doesn't only waffle on Iraq she waffles on every issue.
2007-11-02 04:49:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by thebigshowernie 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think Hilliary Clinton is on the issue of truth as
much as she is trying to help in the illegal immigrant
situation! that no-one has the answer to as yet! even
though she neither answered yes! or no! she saw
the reason for issuing License to illegals in New York, and
because she did'nt agree with the others or disagree did not
mean she upholded any one's decision to do anything.
Nobody else can put a cap on the illegal problem,so
why is she so different. Hilliary might be the wisdom that
America needs in the White House, let alone the senate.
2007-11-02 04:46:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Joan Sandverysmart 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary is not dishonest or wishywashy, she is just a politician. At this stage in the game, if she took a solid position on any of the issues, she is guaranteed to alienate some voters and lose some votes. However, if she were to win the democratic election and run for president, she would have to take a solid stance to get votes from the voters.
2007-11-02 04:36:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by spyDonut 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
confident, and what became the effect of that "info?" It got here to no longer something did no longer it? yet why point out that as quickly as you could in simple terms tell a ingredient of the story so it sounds incredibly undesirable. and what's with the lovable remark approximately that there is not any statute of hassle on homicide? It wasn't homicide, it became a suicide. in case you think of you could instruct otherwise, please fill us in. in line with possibility you have some pertinent information that wasn't already long gone over and disregarded via the investigators who desperate it became certainly a suicide. have not got it? think of that. And the place is the question you need Sen. Clinton to answer. You point out a question, yet you do no longer let us know what question this is that she did no longer answer.
2016-11-10 01:26:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by lizarraga 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No she can never be truthful. She doesn't even know what her truth is. She thinks she is entitled to skirt around every hardball question and when people don't let her get away with it she says everybody is ganging up on her cause she is a woman. If you can't even handle tough questions from people in your own party how the he** are you ever going to be tough enough to handle sitting across the table from an enemy of the U.S. She makes me sick!
2007-11-02 04:59:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Now that would require a willing suspension of disbelief!
She has so many answers for the same question or dodges questions or changes her accent or etc etc.
I don't know how many red flares have to go up about her before people take a real look at her.
2007-11-02 05:13:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
As long as she can take all sides she will try. She is like trying to nail down jell-o. Bill needs to teach her the bite the lip awe chucks look when asked hard questions.
2007-11-02 05:05:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Texan~to_the-Max 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. The only major accomplishment of Bill Clinton's first term was getting a second. Why would his wife be any different?
2007-11-02 04:40:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by JJHantsch 4
·
1⤊
0⤋