driver's licenses to illegals will hurt her campaign? Voters have never before seen a candidate contradict themselves as they witnessed during last weeks debate. Thanks to youtube those who missed it can view and review it over again. So do you believe this will mortally wound Hildabeast's campaign, or will the DNC ignore it as usual?
2007-11-02 03:56:06 · 13 answers · asked by Cherie 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Free Rad--yes, I meant within the TWO MINUTES
2007-11-02 04:14:59 · update #1
Clinton supporters don't care about the issues. They only care about the celebrity from her last name and the fact that she is a rich white woman.
If they really cared about the issues they would shun her for promising change in health care for 13 years and has yet to do anything about it. They would be irate that she has a new "health care plan" that she will put in place if elected, but she refuses to introduce the plan to the senate now. (obviously she can not submit the plan as President because that office has no power to do so).
Hillary has not authored, co-authored or shown any support in congress for ANY of her Senate election promises ( which just happen to be the same as her presidential promises).
How long will these people allow her to lie to them?
2007-11-02 04:06:36 · answer #1 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
She is doing this a number of times already but until the mainstream media, which she is the darling of, strikes on it the voters will forget about it. At the debate she at one time in her response said she knew little about the detail of Rangel's tax plan but she supported the concept once she saw it, then a few minutes later in the same response she said she differed with him on the details which to anyone I know means you have seen the details contradicting a previous statement all within a few minutes. She is rightfully seen as speaking out of both sides of her mouth by conservatives, the reason to try to get moderates and the far left on her side giving each their needed issue stands. This use to be called double speak and the Republicans need to hammer her on this now.
2007-11-02 05:43:39 · answer #2 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The more I know and have learned from others who are more experienced in the political arena the more I see just why everyone dislikes her.
In that very 2 minutes? Amazing.
We can all only hope and pray someone so dismally unprepared and fickle will never get near that office. You should at the *very* least know where you stand on each issue before you throw your hat in the ring.
2007-11-02 06:36:40 · answer #3 · answered by angibabi113 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sad thing is that she WILL get away with it because her supporters are lemmings, worse so than most candidates followers and that is saying something. She is a bad person and a bad candidate, besides after 20 yrs of Bush/Clinton, Why would any sane person want 4-8 more
2007-11-02 04:08:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
There has been a lot of coverage of this. I honestly wish it would hurt her, as I don't want her to get the nomination, but I am afraid it probably will not. Remember how badly Bush did in the debates in '04? It certainly did not hurt him much.
2007-11-02 04:00:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
your question is flawed:
"Voters have never before seen a candidate contradict themselves as they witnessed during last weeks debate"
you mean Hilary was the first ever candidate to contradict him/herself? i am fairly certain ALL politicians have done so at some point.
a contradiction is no big deal. candidates, being people, have a right to change their minds.
the problem with Hilary is that she is being sketchy and evasive on some issues, not that she has contradicted herself. a contradiction may be nothing more than a change of heart; evasiveness is rarely anything more than disguised deception.
2007-11-02 04:00:08 · answer #6 · answered by Free Radical 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I'm 90% sure the GOP has footage of all of her reversals throughout her political career, and are planning on playing all of them if she gets the nod. Why that particular instance was interesting was because she did it all at once and her Dem opponents jumped right on it.
2007-11-02 04:04:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She is a good campaigner because she avoids all the tough questions. She tries to stay neutral on everything.
Unfortunately for her, it is turning her into a big Flip-Flopper.
2007-11-02 04:04:10 · answer #8 · answered by Fred Head 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They have already begun damage control, and will play it off as "things have changed and I have had to rethink my position, that is what a good leader does in a changing world." She will cover her behind, as the teflon madame has so many times in the past. What I meant to say, or taking out of context, or YOU misunderstood.
2007-11-02 04:01:15 · answer #9 · answered by libsticker 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I.) you like the luscious, gooey feeling of somebody else's saliva on your dermis. you start to rub it throughout your physique... confident... heaven. How ever, if it wasn't a warm woman, i could l.) different, press costs.
2016-12-15 14:11:07 · answer #10 · answered by rensing 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋