shes just tired of the media.
but to me, i couldnt care less!
she can moan all she can, i'll just turn off the telly!!
2007-11-02 03:33:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by silly 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I do think she is being very hypocritical.
I'm not sure why she is saying she hates the media but then does a load of interviews all over the world to tell the globe about her dislike for the media.
Surely if she had just shut up and allowed the storm to settle she would have been forgotten very soon.
However with each interview she seems to add a bit more personal info about her marriage and divorce which nobody actually asked about.
2007-11-02 10:38:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
heather mills is a complete liar - as jonathon ross says - well find out shes got two legs next ...
funny how, whenever she wants sympathy she is hobbling around on crutches or in a wheelchair - yes thats right the same heather mills who was in a dancing competion
anyone hear about the 100 grands worth of fireworks that she flitted away on a birthday paty - that could have been used for one of her charitable causes
paul mac should team up with the papers and take her to court, if she says the media is lying then sue them for libel - but it would go the same way jeffers archer went - that way macca might get his cash back from his divorce
gold digging ***** - end of
2007-11-02 14:34:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by james d 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes I think she has brought it all on herself. I think that she should get a very modest settlement from Paul as they were married a very short time and he had his fortune long before he met her. I think she needs help to get on with her life away from the spotlight. In the interview all she talked about was herself as if her life was hard... with a possible 25 million pound plus settlement I'm sure all our hearts bleed for her. Take the money and have a quiet life I say the general public couldnt give a damn I'm sure. She's ranting and raving about all her so-called problems and we are all just trying to pay the mortgage and get on with our lives. I think she needs to grow up. I do respect her for her animal charity work that she has done in the past though.
2007-11-02 11:16:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep-she knew what she was getting herself into from the outset alright! When she was interviewed on gmtv--there was a distinct lack of tears when she was 'crying', i wish she would do us ALL a favour and limp orf somewhere else!! And as for HIM--america's donald trump got it exactly right when he said that the guy is a shmuck--anyone with the amount of wealth mcartney has who doesn't get a 'pre-nup' is a shmuck, nuf said!!
2007-11-03 06:35:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I really like and respect her, and I can only hope that the divorce between her and Paul goes amicably, and that they can arrive at some sort of future settlement for their respective careers and families. It might be trendy to knock her, but quite honestly how many of us could cope with waking up under the duvet every morning to find that we only have one leg?
2007-11-02 10:49:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I feel that Paul McCartney has been lucky to have (nearly) got rid of this one! I mean one minute she's spilling the beans on the marriage to the world and the next minute she is saying 'why are the press hounding me?' when she's given them a story on a plate!!
2007-11-02 10:35:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Indigorock 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
I cant believe that she compared her treatment by the press as the same as a Pedophile or murder! That did her no favours in my book! Think she just opens her mouth and lets her belly rumble.
2007-11-02 10:38:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Janie B 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
She is having a difficult time living under the microscope of the media.
She seems to be lashing out from frustration. I believe that she is genuinely worried about her safety and that of her child, but she needs to calm down and just disappear for a while. She needs to move somewhere really remote for a year or two.
2007-11-02 10:36:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mikey 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
She was well known before she married Paul. That is Saint Paul, the Beatle. The much older Beatle, who married a woman half his age . And then he tgried to bribe her by saying he'd settle with her if she kept her mouth shut. Unfortunately he picked a modern woman, who won't be told what to do.
2007-11-02 11:10:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by True Blue Brit 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
its the press as usual making her look really bad - i do feel slightly sorry for her yes but shes gonna make millions from the divorce - so not that sorry really - but the press are laying it on too thick imo. but its all the suckers that buy the crap tho.
2007-11-02 11:19:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by ejb199 6
·
0⤊
0⤋