I think it's an integrity / trust issue. Hillary will say whatever to whoever whenever if it will get her votes. She just admitted that she is FOR giving the illegal aliens drivers licenses in NY!
Hillary is at best a hypocrite. She thinks she can get away with out answering any tough questions. She's a chameleon - she says whatever she thinks her current audience wants to hear.
Remember when she was in Arkansas, she had an Arkansas accent - even though she's from Chicago, and was a grown women when she moved to Arkansas. Now she's in NY and she doesn't have an accent anymore. Why can't she tell us about her positions? She won't because she knows if she does, people would say HELL NO! She's the only candidate who can get away with laughing at all the difficult questions. What a joke....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Etk_O-nhl...
2007-11-02 03:34:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by MauriceChavez 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
IT may not be logical, but I would like to see someone other than the two warring families of the Bushes and the CLintons be in charge of our country. Their are over 200 million people in this country yet for some reason we have only been able to find Presidents from two families in the last 20 years. That doesn't make any sense or seem like a good thing to have happen.
Mostly, I just want someone with a different point of view and a fresh approach. I don't want Hillary to be elected and then bring back all the people like James Carville and Henry Cisneros in an attempt to go back to 1996. It is time for someone new.
2007-11-02 10:18:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Susan W 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
People who don't like Hillary can roughly be divided into three categories.You got people who absolutely can't stand the woman for personal reasons.They don't really have a reason they just can't stand her.That happens to everyone so no need to elaborate.
The second group are the original Clinton bashers.This are the people who never got over Bills popularity.They still can't believe with all the lies they told and mud they threw Bill Clinton remained popular and loved by Americans and the world.Their reason to hate Hillary is solely because she's a Clinton.They are the crowd that says she's a socialist,throws the Clinton Body count around(a debunked fabrication) and supports every story no matter the source to damage her campaign.
The third group is left,more left than the Clintons.It's the group I can relate to most though I do support Hillary.They usually have a problem because she has very close ties with the pro Israeli lobby.They are opposed to her because she sells out to big business(was on the board of Wallmart),doesn't dare to take a stand or a firm stand on gay rights but always tries to stay in the middle.She does that on a lot of issues.They usually support more left leaning candidates like Kucinich or Gravel.
Those candidates are closer to me on the issues to but they don't have a chance to win.
Though I can see why and for a big part even can agree to the left critisism of Hillary I don't understand how it can go that far that it would turn into the hate some on the left express.Some say things like Hillary is Bush light or even Hillary is more of the same.
Bill wasn't a liberal by far when he was in the white house but Americans were better of and I'm sure they also will be much better of under a new Clinton Presidency than under any option the GOP has to offfer.
2007-11-02 03:40:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
1. She doesn't answer any direct questions.
2. She had her law records under court order for 4 years and by magic they show up outside her office in DC after they move into the White House and nobody cares.
3. She has all the records of when she was in the White House seal in Bill's presidential library. So much for openness.
4. Calling a general a lair to his face that came from combat.
5. Her way of the way she changes the way she talks depending on who is front of her.
6. Getting on national TV and creating "vast right wing" conspiracy when her husband did do it.
7. How she wants the government to take over health care but doesn't want to show her whole plan.... Reminds me of " Don't look behind the curtain Dorthy"
8. What is her stand on illegals getting drivers licensee now at 09:32 CST? That won't change before I hit post.
That should give you something to think about.
2007-11-02 03:35:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Because we are currently at war with a group of people who view women as 2ND rate citizens. To them, women should have no power and should be punished for leaving the home without their husband or brothers. Hillary hated the Taliban during Bills years for this reason. She says she will negotiate and withdrawal our troops.
America will not be taken seriously by these countries and their fanatic thinking. I also have an issue with Her or any other candidate who blames Bush for using Soldiers and the Military for political gain, while She is doing the same thing. Why does Hillary and the rest of the Democrats want to continue to restrict the war budget, and have the guts to state they want a withdraw date before handing over more money? They are looking for political gain while our soldiers get killed because they don't have the money for new equipment, or to armor their vehicles etc. She says the war is not winnable, while her and the rest of the democrats cut funding. How can you win a war without money and equipment?
That is 1 reason why I don't want to see her elected.
2007-11-02 03:35:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Colonel 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
She is a liar. Has no moral compass. Has no strong stance on issues. Is only power hungry. Wants socialism. Wants voter fraud. Wants higher taxes. Wants bigger government. Wants illegal immigration. Wants more government intrusion into peoples lives. Has not suggested a solution to anything. Hates people becoming rich.
Her web site is static and only reflects what the polls say she ought to say. Have you heard her stance on drivers licenses for illegals in New York? She wants this to happen. Well, just think of the can of worms this opens. You have a driver license then you can register to vote. Also, you become quasi-legal because you now have identification. Lets see she voted against legislation that would not permit states to grant drivers licenses to illegals. She said she has no objections to this. And in the same breath will say she is against this after laying out a case for how good it is. Do you really want this type of strong character governing this country?
2007-11-02 03:36:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by ken 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
She has a long history. A lot of baggage. Questionable tactics. Questionable removal of documents through out her career. Rose Law Firm, pre' 9/11 Commission papers from the National Archives removed, she has numerous in their library she refuses to make public, now campaign donations and record keeping does not match up.(HSU and chinese bus boy money .. then she is the only one taking Federal Lobbyist $ leaving her open to returning political favors every where)
Her performance last Tuesday Democratic Debate (MSNBC video has it to watch in it's entirety) now the spin "Boy's Club".
International concerns include a grand mass of boys who will have no mercy for any US President. Let alone show a female one special favors because she is just a woman. Likely the opposite. SO to be in affective during a debate shows her lack of the right stuff in my opinion. Just the tip of the ice berg with this candidate. Her trail goes deep and much is thick in mud and politics as usual. Same same. NO change, and experience in throwing the mud around.
Hope that helps some what. Good luck.
2007-11-02 03:32:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
We do not want a queer for our president! She is an it! Also she is a criminal who should have been indicted after the State of New York fired her for her illegal activities. She will actually make our Country, the USA worse than it is now! Stop her, she should have not ever been assigned to be our Secretary of State. We want a good and strong leader that will help the USA like Donald Trump! Get this Hilldebeast out of the running and off the Ticket. She is giving the Democrats a very bad name!
2016-06-10 07:25:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by GEOFFREY & WENDY 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am against her because she is a member of CFR, and because she has been to Bilderberger meetings, and because she is financed by the same people who are trying to create the sinister and evil NWO, and because she is pro NWO, which means that she is an elitist. She is the chosen candidate of the Elite, and they always seem to get exactly what they want, whether the rest of us like it or not. The Elite don't give a rat's a$$ about the interests of the people, because we are less than animals as far as they are concerned.
By the way, I fall into the third group that Just Good Folks listed. My Favorite is Mike Gravel. *sm*
2007-11-02 04:00:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by LadyZania 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
IM SHOCKED AT THE ANSWERS YOU ARE GETTING. I believe if Condoleeza ran towards Hillary - as she is the one severe challenger - it could plasce too many humans in a vote casting dilema. A Black Female Republican or a White Female Liberal. White westerners and Nationalists could be at a loss being FORCED to vote Hillary simply due to the fact that of racism and all people else could voted Rice quite simply to get a difference of colour as you recounted. I could love to look this race with them as applicants to because it could be so interesting - like a race conflict just about.
2016-09-05 08:14:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋